<span>Assuming that this is referring to the same list of options that was posted before with this question, <span>the correct response would be that it divided the Church into North and South regions, since it was actually East and West. </span></span>
Separation is the type of nationalist movements
Explanation:
Let's start with the explanation of the basic belief of nationalism which is nothing but people who belong to a single nationality or ancestry should come and live under the same government. There are three types of the nationalist movement and they are unification, separation and state-building. As the word unification defines it is nothing but merging the politically divided land but they are culturally same. Separation is defined as culturally distinct groups resist to be a part of a state. State-building is a culturally distinct group forming into a state.
Answer:
Apartheid was a political and social system in South Africa during the era of White minority rule. It enforced racial discrimination against non-Whites, mainly focused on skin colour and facial features. This existed in the twentieth century, from 1948 until the early-1990s.
Explanation:
Answer:
This case involves a federal death sentence imposed on defendant-appellant Fields for conviction of a federal capital offense. Fields was sentenced to death largely on the basis of the opinion of a psychiatrist who stated that he could confidently predict Fields would be dangerous in the future. The psychiatrist testified that he did not know of any "standard psychiatric or medical procedures used in arriving at a determination or predicting future dangerousness" and that he was unaware of specific empirical data or studies. He issued his opinion without engaging in any testing or any other objective measures or use of an actuarial method. His basis for this opinion was discussions with the prosecutors and review of some records regarding the defendant. The defense attorney objected to the testimony as unreliable under the standards for expert testimony established by the U.S. Supreme Court in Daubert v. Merrill Dow Pharmaceutical (i.e., that proffered evidence must be grounded in scientific reasoning or methodology). The district court overruled the objections and allowed the expert testimony to go to the jury.
Explanation:
