Answer:
I believe the answer is because it makes the soil more fertile
Explanation:
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Unfortunately, you did not mention the ideas you learned in your lesson. That is why we cannot base our answer on that premise.
What we can do is to help to answer the question based on our knowledge of this topic.
The basic steps did the U.S. Government take to return the nation to "normalcy" after the war?
The US government under new President Warren G. Harding had promised during his political campaign that he would turn the United States to normalcy after World War I.
So the things he did was to maintain a foreign policy of neutrality to not interfere in the affairs of Europe or any other region. He made the US federal government stay out of international conflicts in what could be understood as a policy of isolationism.
The US federal government decide not to sign the Versailles Treaty and was not part of the foundation of the League of Nations.
Prohibition was also legislation passed that intended to maintain peace and order in the US society. And all of this helped to welcome the economic period known as the "Roaring 1920s," in which Americans had money to buy many things, mostly on credit: cars, electro domestics, and houses.
That mostly depends on the country that held them, however, the common forms of protest were either calm protests that weren't violent, or they were full blown civil wars of independence with numerous battles, or they were based on guerilla warfare where they would lead a war of attrition with the western powers until they decided to just leave.
Hope this helped!
<h3>
<u>Answer</u><u> </u><u>:</u><u>-</u></h3>
Pythagoras was a Greek ancient mathematician .
Hence the correct option is [b] .
He has given Pythagoras Theorem or Baudhayan Theorem which states that ,
<u>Pytha</u><u>goras</u><u> Theorem</u><u> </u><u>:</u>
<em>In</em><em> </em><em>a</em><em> </em><em>right </em><em>angled</em><em> </em><em>triangle</em><em> </em><em>,</em><em> </em><em>the</em><em> </em><em>sum</em><em> </em><em>of </em><em>squares</em><em> </em><em>of</em><em> </em><em>base</em><em> </em><em>and</em><em> </em><em> </em><em>perpe</em><em>ndicular</em><em> </em><em>is</em><em> </em><em>equal </em><em>to</em><em> </em><em>the</em><em> </em><em>square</em><em> </em><em>of</em><em> </em><em>hypo</em><em>ntenuse</em><em> </em><em>.</em><em> </em>

<u>Converse</u><u> of</u><u> </u><u>Pytha</u><u>goras</u><u> Theorem</u><u> </u><u>:</u>
<em>If in a triangle the sum of </em><em> </em><em>squares </em><em>of</em><em> </em><em>two</em><em> </em><em>sides </em><em>of</em><em> </em><em>tria</em><em>ngle</em><em> </em><em>is</em><em> </em><em>equal</em><em> </em><em>to</em><em> </em><em>the</em><em> </em><em>square </em><em>of</em><em> </em><em>longest</em><em> </em><em>side</em><em> </em><em>,</em><em> </em><em>then</em><em> </em><em>the</em><em> </em><em>angle </em><em>oppo</em><em>site</em><em> </em><em>to</em><em> </em><em>the </em><em>longest</em><em> </em><em>side </em><em>will</em><em> </em><em>be</em><em> </em><em>a</em><em> </em><em>right</em><em> </em><em>angle</em><em> </em><em>that</em><em> </em><em>is</em><em> </em><em>9</em><em>0</em><em>°</em><em> </em><em>.</em>
Perhaps no controversy has generated as much attention as that
surrounding the imposition of the death penalty. Since the adoption of the
Bill of Rights, our Constitution has contained the eighth amendment1
proscription against those punishments which are "cruel and unusual."
Notwithstanding this principle the implementation of capital punishment
has been traditionally accepted as a legitimate function of our system of
criminal justice.
In order to understand the problem of capital punishment, the social
and political background of the movement against capital punishment, both
in the United States2 and abroad, must be examined. Accordingly, before
undertaking an analysis of Furman v. Georgia,5 this Comment will undertake
a detailed and exhaustive examination of capital punishment as it
developed in England and the United States. Such an examination will
set the foundation for a critical evaluation of the arguments for and against
capital punishment as advanced by the Furman Court. The issue of capital
punishment cannot be discussed in a legal vacuum, but must be viewed
from a moral, social, political, and philosophical, as well as legal, perspective.
With this structural background, this Comment will examine the road
to Furman - the legislative history and case law which comprises the
backbone of the eighth amendment. It is only by a combination of the
social and political trends and the legal precedents that Furman can be
fully appreciated