Answer:
The main way to make this argument is to say that it is exceedingly difficult for the government to determine what constitutes an unfair job. This is something that is beyond the ability of the government to judge.
It is one thing for the government to protect workers from things like unsafe jobs. It is much more possible to decide in an objective way what jobs are unsafe. We can look at things like workplace injuries and deaths and say that a job is unsafe. It is also clear that workers should not be subjected to unsafe conditions while at work.
By contrast, things are very much more difficult when it comes to the issue of fairness. There is no objective way to determine (for example) whether it is unfair for a fast food restaurant in New York City to pay its employees $8.00 per hour after they have been working there 2 or 3 years.
Because of such issues, it does not make sense for the government to protect workers from unfair jobs. It is simply impossible to determine what jobs are unfair when it comes to things like wages or opportunities for advancement. Therefore, (we can argue) the government should not try to make these decisions.
The idea of an accused person's right to due process was originally found in which English document?
A. Magna Carta
the first one is:
it changed daily life because people didn't need gas or anything because they had animals move them around.
it improved in the 20th century because we don't need animals move us place to place and everything is electrical nowadays.
your welcome hope this helps
<span>It never spread beyond the borders of the Byzantine Empire.</span>
Answer:
OHe showed religious and political tolerance to conquered peoples.
I could only do the one answer
Explanation:
To achieve this, Cyrus left local rulers in place after conquering a region, and he allowed the local population to continue practicing their preferred religious traditions. These policies ensured that conquered regions continued to function economically and reduced the chance that they would rebel against him.
