1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Lelechka [254]
3 years ago
13

PLEASE HELP ASAP!

History
1 answer:
torisob [31]3 years ago
6 0

Alexander III of Macedon, or as more commonly referred to, Alexander the Great, was a leader that had its nice and bad characteristics.

Good characteristics can be:

- Great leader;

He hold tightly the Macedonians and Paionians, gave them a strong identity, and made them feel as the greatest people in the world.

- Excellent military tactician;

Managed to overcome much larger armies multiple types on totally unfamiliar terrain. Also, he never allowed a Greek to be a general in his army, which was probably his wisest move, as the Greeks hated the Macedonians.

- Making steps into the globalization process;

He wanted and tried to merge people from different cultures, religions, ethnicity, races, into one, and to work together and tolerate each other.

Bad characteristics can be:

- Alienation;

He was very often alienated, as he was putting himself in the realm of half god, half human.

- Holding to his own desires without taking in consideration what's best for the others;

His army was suffering by the end of his campaign, was exhausted, and wanted to return to Macedonia to their families, but he just didn't cared about it.

- Making a genocide;

The Macedonians and the Greeks hated each other for centuries, and the Greeks could not stand the fact that they are occupied by their hated neighbors, so they were rebelling constantly, and also escaped from the battle-scene at Gaugamela, and that made Alexander very angry, so he set his armies on the Greek city-states and killed over 20,000 of them.

You might be interested in
Describe the process of Western Europe transforming from a unified Roman Empire in 330 to independent nation-states in 1500.
Nikitich [7]

The process that saw Western Europe going from a unified Roman Empire to independent nation-states was:

  • Roman empire weakens and barbarians take hold of Roman lands.
  • Barbarians establish numerous Kingdoms and nation-states.
  • Monarchs share power with nobles in the feudalistic system.
  • Black death weakens the power of nobles and increases that of monarchs.
  • Monarchs consolidate power and establish true nation-states.

<h3>How did Europe's nation-states form?</h3>

After the Roman empire broke up as a result of several factors including the incursions of barbarians, several kingdoms were formed.

These kingdoms expanded and contracted under the reign of kings who shared power with nobles. Eventually, the monarchs gained the upper hand and established independent nation-states.

Find out more on the fall of the Roman empire at brainly.com/question/1276486.

#SPJ1

3 0
2 years ago
Thomas Jefferson was selected to write the Declaration of Independence by
denpristay [2]

Answer:d

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
An example of what happens when a government tries to tax the economically disadvantaged and then jail them if they couldn't pay
Alexus [3.1K]
I believe the answer to this question is A
6 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What roles did the European Union, the United States, and NATO play<br> in post-Cold War Europe?
sweet-ann [11.9K]

Answer:

Questionable Role of NATO in the Post-Cold-War Era. ... NATO was then conceived as a potent military means of common defense of the Western Allies. To counteract NATO's military might the USSR created the Warsaw Pact in 1955, at the time when the Western Germany was made a NATO member

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
In Italy the ______ river flows from the alps into the Adriatic Sea
kykrilka [37]

PO River is the name of the river

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • This map shows the enrollment ratio of the state university<br>freshman.​
    10·2 answers
  • What change in government policy took place at the end of World War I?
    10·2 answers
  • Who was Neil Armstrong​
    5·1 answer
  • Three advantages that corporations brought to America were: employment unions lower prices tenements a share of the profits
    15·2 answers
  • Which group of Americans was most prosperous in the immediate post-World War II period?
    8·1 answer
  • Which of the following was not an effect of the United States joining the war?
    8·2 answers
  • PLEASE HELP
    12·2 answers
  • HELP ME ASAP!!<br> What does this picture represent?
    11·1 answer
  • I was soon put down under the decks, and there I received such a salutation [greeting] in my nostrils as I had never experienced
    14·1 answer
  • A renewed sense of nationalism is a characteristic of which era?
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!