Customer questions for one vendor have increased with the promotional campaign because it doesn't meet the customer satisfaction in terms of :
- Quality
- Commitment to feedback
<h3>Why do companies get so much question after
promotional campaign ?</h3>
Promotional campaign were to sensitize the potential customer about a particular product from a company so as to attract them to make a purchase.
However, this campaign should be able to tell more about the product up to some extent that they will get convinced about the product, failure of this will make the potential customer to inquire more out of doubt about the product and this will show in the Vendor performance metrics.
Learn more about promotional campaign at:
brainly.com/question/357428
#SPJ1
Answer:
The correct answer is: continue operating, exit the market.
Explanation:
The total revenue of a firm is $1,250.
The variable cost is $1,000.
The total fixed cost is $500.
At this level of output, the firm is maximizing profit.
The total cost here is
= TFC + TVC
= $500 + $1,000
= $1,500
The total cost incurred is greater than the total revenue earned. This means that the firm is having losses. The firm will not shut down in the short run as it will operate until the variable cost is being covered.
But in the long run, the firm will exit the market as it will need to cover all the costs to continue operating.
Answer: Option B
Explanation: In simple words, positive reinforcement means motivating someone to perform a job more efficiently and frequently by offering them some reward for doing so. While punishment refers to penalizing someone for any offense.
In the given case, James has been offering the incentives to his employees but have also made a clause to withhold them in case of unprofessional behavior.
Thus, from the above we can conclude that the correct option is B .
Answer:
just ask your teacher, thats what they are there for
Explanation:
Answer:
$120,000
Explanation:
Given:
Shares owned by Fritz = of number of the shares of the other three shareholders i.e of all the shares
Shares owned by Luis = of number of the shares of the other three shareholders i.e of all the shares
Shares owned by Alfred = of number of the shares of the other three shareholders i.e of all the shares
Therefore,
Shares owned by them together =
= of all shares,
This means that Werner owns = 1 − of all shares,
= of all shares
i.e
= × $3,600,000
= $120,000