Again same here, isolate the y variable to get it in y=mx+b form
6y=2x+15 divide by 6 to isolate the y and your equation is...
y=1/3x+15/6. Or 15/6 can be simplified to 5/2.
Answer:
see explanation
Step-by-step explanation:
Given
9n² - n - 
= 0 ← multiply through by 3 to clear the fraction
27n² - 3n - 2 = 0 ← factoring
Consider the factors of the product of the n² term and the constant term which sum to give the coefficient of the n- term
product = 27 × - 2 = - 54 and sum = - 3
The factors are - 9 and + 6
Use these factors to split the n- term
27n² - 9n + 6n - 2 = 0 ( factor the first/second and third/fourth terms )
9n(3n - 1) + 2(3n - 1) = 0 ← factor out (3n - 1) from each term
(3n - 1)(9n + 2) = 0
Equate each factor to zero and solve for n
3n - 1 = 0 ⇒ 3n = 1 ⇒ n = 
9n + 2 = 0 ⇒ 9n = - 2 ⇒ n = - 
Sorry but you didnt add a picture nor description. If you can, please re-ask this question with the following:
Details to your question
A picture or drawing
Thanks - Madilyn.
Can you restate the question please
Hello! I can help you with this!
a. The function that would best represent Samantha's account is f(5) = 500(1 + 0.04)^5. This is because $500 is the principal, the interest rate is 4%, and we're looking for the amount in the savings account 5 years later.
b. Okay. 1 = 0.04 is 1.04. 1.04^5 is 1.216652902. It's a long decimal, but don't delete it. Multiply that decimal by 500 and you get 608.32645 and other numbers behind it or 608 when rounded to the nearest dollar. Samantha will have about $608 in her savings account in 5 years.
Note: The formula goes like this: f(x) = P(1 + r)^x. This means, you add 1 and the simple interest rate in decimal form together and raise that up by the exponent. There is no shortcuts for this, so you'll have to use the calculator. There will be a very long decimal, but don't clear it. Instead, multiply it by the principal to get the answer. It seems very complicating, but if you do this right, it gets easier overtime and you'll make less errors. There are more complex problems out there, so this formula is very important, but it was kept simple for this question.
