Answer:
d. Transactions exposure.
Explanation:
Transactions exposure -
It is the level of uncertainty involved in a business in the international trade face .
It is the risk which currency exchange rates would fluctuate after the firm has taken a financial obligation .
The high level of vulnerability to shift the exchange rates can lead to the loss of the major capital for the international business .
Hence from the information of the question , the correct answer is d. Transactions exposure .
Answer:
Paul Hyatt is fully liable for all business debts
Explanation:
Unlimited liability in this scenario, means that Paul Hyatt is fully liable for all business debts. That is because unlimited liability is defined as the full legal responsibility that business owners and partners assume for all business debts, and since Paul Hyatt is a sole proprietor which means that he both owns and runs DeepCleans and there is no legal distinction between him and the business entity, then he is fully liable for debts and profits of DeepClean.
Answer:
(1) To gain dominance in the Autonomous driving Technology.
(2) To utilize the vast network of drivers of Lyft to enhance the use of its technology
(3) To strategically place itself to compete favourably with other Autonomous driving Technology firms.
(4) To enhance its performance and profitability.
PART B
Lyft has a better transparent and user friendly application generally people trust their app in terms of pricing and trip duration.
LYFT HAS A BETTER REPUTATION THAN UBER WHICH HAS BEEN INVOLVED IN SERIES OF SCAMS IN 2017.
Explanation:
Waymo is a sister company to Google owned by alphabet inc., It is an autonomous driving Technology company with a state of the art Technology in the self driving cars.
Lyft is an American company which is involved in car lift,car hailing, car sharing etc services in major cities of the United States of America, it has developed a vast network of drivers and routes through out the United States.
The alliance between Waymo and Lyft was mainly to help both entities leverage on the competence of each party for the greater good of Both Companies.
Answer:
The answer is: Yes
Explanation:
The money Alice paid in 1985 ($20,000) is considered a sunk cost.
A sunk cost is money already spent that cannot be recovered.
So if Alice decides to buy the land or not, she will not recover a cent from the $20,000 she paid before.
Since the current price of the land is $110,000 and Alice can purchase it for $100,000, then she should buy it. She is going to earn a $10,000 profit.
