Answer:
Option D. Not enough information to answer this question.
Explanation:
There are number of factors the company considers before entering or exiting the market and some of these include Marginal cost or marginal revenue analysis, project analysis which considers the future cost and benefits by continuing the business, Porter five forces factors consideration before entering, Capabilities and resource analysis, etc.
So merely a price doesn't decides that we going to enter the market or we are leaving the market. Their are chances that we can control the cost of that the competitor starts selling the product at cost which will have harmful impact.
So the information provided to answer this question is not enough.
Answer:
The correct answer is project A, B and D.
Explanation:
According to the given scenario, the given data are as follows:
Low risk WACC project = 8%
Average risk WACC project = 10%
High risk WACC project = 12%
As the company always prefer the projects that exceeds the WACC projects.
So,
- Project A has 15% which exceeds the high risk WACC project.
- Project B has 12% which exceeds the average risk WACC project
- Project C has 11% which does not exceeds the high risk WACC project, hence it is not the correct answer.
- Project D has 9% which exceeds the low risk WACC project.
Answer:
b. increases ; 2.5
Explanation:
MPC stands for Marginal Propensity to Consume. In economics, the MPC may be defined as the metric that quantifies the induced consumption. It is the concept that determines that the increase in the spending of personal consumer occurs with increase in the disposable income.
It is estimated that as the MPC increases, the spending multiplier also increases. MCP is the ratio of consumption function to the disposal income change. When the MCp is 0.6, then the multiplier becomes 2.5 if there is no imports and taxes involved.
Answer:
1)Celia actually did charge $3,000 on her credit card and admitted such to the credit card company, but argued she only had $2,500 in her bank account to pay off the credit card.
Telling a bank or a credit card company that you do not have enough money top pay right now will not make them forgive the unpaid balance. They might offer you some type of agreement or schedule for you to pay for the remaining balance (in this case $500). A court will never rule in favor of a borrower just because they do not want to pay the whole balance and will not accept a payment schedule.
3) Celia and the credit card company agreed that Celia would pay $2,500 as full payment of the disputed debt, but Celia never paid the $2,500.
When Celia and the credit card company reached an agreement to settle their dispute, that agreement is binding on both parties. Celia must pay the $2,500 and the credit card company will not charge any more money. But if Celia doesn't make the payment, she is not performing her part and the credit card company can sue her for it, and will probably win.
Explanation:
the options are missing:
- Celia actually did charge $3,000 on her credit card and admitted such to the credit card company, but argued she only had $2,500 in her bank account to pay off the credit card.
- Celia actually did charge $3,000 on her credit card and admitted such to the credit card company. However, Celia had no money, so she offered the credit card company her car in exchange for full payment of the debt and the credit card company accepted. Celia turned over title to her car to the credit card company.
- Celia and the credit card company agreed that Celia would pay $2,500 as full payment of the disputed debt, but Celia never paid the $2,500.
- Celia believed she did not charge anything on her credit card during her trip to Las Vegas. The credit card company claims she charged $3,000 to the card while in Las Vegas.
I would go with answer “c”
