Answer:
Risk and Return
1. Joe is an average investor. His financial advisor gave him options of investing in stock A, with a σ of 12%, and stock B, with a σ of 9%. Both stocks have the same expected return of 16%. Joe can pick only one stock and decides to invest in stock B.
Good Financial Decision?
Yes
No
2. Marcie works for an educational technology firm that recently launched its employee stock option plan (ESOP). Marcie allocated all her investments in the ESOP.
Good Financial Decision?
Yes
No
3. rin wants to invest in a hedge fund that has had a very strong performance track record. The hedge fund has given its investors a return of over 60% for the past five years. Although Erin is tempted to put her money in the fund, she decides to conduct due diligence on the hedge fund’s assets, because she is aware that past performance is no guarantee of future results.
Good Financial Decision?
Yes
No
Explanation:
1. Joe's decision to invest in stock B is a good financial decision. Since both investments have the same returns, the decision on which investment to take shifts to the standard deviation of the returns, which specifies the variability of the returns. Invariably, the investment with less standard deviation should win the vote. Therefore, Joe's decision is a good financial decision because investment in B has a standard deviation of 9% unlike A's 12%.
2. Putting all eggs in one market as Marcie had done by allocating all her investments in the ESOP is not a good financial decision, theoretically. It is always best to spread the risks, though higher-yielding investments (returns) bear higher risks.
3. The decision of Erin to conduct due diligence on the hedge fund's assets, despite its past performance is a good financial decision. Due diligence reveals some behind-the-scene information that are instrumental in making sound business decisions. Who are the present managers of the fund? What systems are in place in the entity to guarantee similar future performance, all things being equal? What market's sentiments and information are available for consideration? These questions, and many others can be answered through a due diligence. Surely, "past performance is no guarantee of future results."
Constitutions and, more specifically, anti-discrimination statutes represent public policy about equal employment opportunity (EEO).
These laws are in place at the federal, state, and local levels in the United States.
In terms of the employers or other entities they cover, the specific groups of people they defend, the transactions they regulate, and the kind and scope of legal remedies they offer, EEO laws differ widely from one location to another. When businesses engage employees, the philosophical idea of EEO is implied, at the very least.
WHAT IS AN "OPPORTUNITY" FOR WORK?
U.S. EEO rules forbid discrimination in terms and circumstances of employment on the basis of specified characteristics. As a result, "opportunities" can be found in a variety of employment circumstances, such as:
- both inside and outside.
- application forms for jobs.
- interviewing potential employees.
- pre-employment examinations
- inquiries into backgrounds.
- Hiring.
- Compensation.
- Benefits.
- Employee services or perks (sometimes known as perquisites).
- working circumstances.
To learn more about equal employment opportunity from the given link.
brainly.com/question/27853265
#SPJ4
Answer:
amortization expense is $36000
Explanation:
given data
purchased = $180000
time = 5 year
to find out
amount recorded as amortization expense
solution
we know here purchased patent for 180000 and here life is 5 years
so here
amortization expense will be purchased / time
amortization expense = purchased / time
amortization expense = 180000 / 5
so amortization expense is $36000
Answer:
A
Explanation:
A budget constraint is a graph that shows all the combination of goods a consumer can consume given current prices and income of the consumer.
If income increases, the budget constraint will shift out parallel to the old
If income decreases, budget constraint will shift in parallel to the old one.