There
That’s the table of values and the graph itself
Answer:
3rd
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
The answer is B.
Step-by-step explanation:
That's because in A. angle S and angle Z aren't corresponding in the congruence of RST and XYZ.
In C. line RS and line ST can' be proven to be congruent because they arent a part of the what we know which is RST is congruent to XYZ. It says nothing about RS being congruent to ST.
And D. has the same problem as A. with the line ST and line XZ not corresponding the what we know. If it had said ST is congruent to YZ, or that RT is congruent to XZ then it would be true. Because RST is congruent to XYZ. And R corresponds to X, S corresponds to Y, and T corresponds to Z.
So B. would be the answer because R and X correspond to one another because it's written as RST ans XYZ and both R and X are the first letters represented in both triangles.
Answer:
What is the question? I cannot see :(
My guess is that the exact answer would be $2544.75 because you would first multiply 2900 by .0675 to get 195.75. Then you would multiply that by 13 to get 2544.75.