Ask question

Ask question

All categories

3 years ago

8

Some companies intentionally manufacture their products with materials or components that will break, wear, rust, or rot sooner

than they should. this practice is called ________.
a. perceived obsolescence
b. redlining
c. planned obsolescence
d. puffery
e. reverse redlining

1 answer:

Ad libitum [116K]3 years ago

6 0

I think the answer is A.

You might be interested in

]by generating and delivering timely and relevant information supported by networks, _____ creates new opportunities for conduct

Alina [70]

The British Empire.

It isn't descriptive enough to seem to be AI or internet.

8 0

3 years ago

On November 30, the end of the first month of operations, Weatherford Company prepared the following income statement, based on

ololo11 [35]

Answer

The answer and procedures of the exercise are attached in the following archives.

Step-by-step explanation:

You will find the procedures, formulas or necessary explanations in the archive attached below. If you have any question ask and I will aclare your doubts kindly.

3 0

3 years ago

According to the law of demand, quantity demanded decreases as ________, ceteris paribus.

vekshin1

D is the answer :3333

4 0

3 years ago

he following labor standards have been established for a particular product: Standard labor-hours per unit of output 9.0 hours S

Arisa [49]

Answer:

Direct labor rate variance= $2,430 favorable.

Explanation:

Giving the following information:

Standard labor rate $ 15.10 per hour

Actual hours worked 8,100 hours

Actual total labor cost $ 119,880

To calculate the direct labor rate variance, we need to use the following formula:

Direct labor rate variance= (Standard Rate - Actual Rate)*Actual Quantity

Actual rate= 119,880/8,100= $14.8

Direct labor rate variance= (15.1 - 14.8)*8,100= $2,430 favorable.

<u>It is favorable because the actual rate for direct labor was lower than the estimated rate.</u>

4 0

3 years ago

Gordon purchased real estate for $900,000 and listed title to the property as "Gordon and Fawn, joint tenants with right of surv

xeze [42]

Answer:

a. Gordon made a gift when the real estate was purchased of <u>$450,000</u> to Fawn.

Since Gordon gave 50% of the real estate to his sister as a gift when he purchased it, the gift must be valued at the time it happened ($900,000 x 50%)

b. Gordon's estate must include <u>$2,900,000</u> as to the property.

Gordon purchased all the real estate by himself, so his estate must include the value of the whole property.

c. How would the estate tax consequences change if it was Fawn (not Gordon) who died?

Fawn's estate would include <u>$0</u> as to the property.

Since Fawn didn't buy the property, her estate cannot include any amount of it.

7 0

3 years ago