Answer:
If you mean the Missouri Compromise...it means that there'll be an invisible 36'30 degree parallel line that'll divide the South territory of the U.S. (South Carolina, North Carolina, Maryland, Kentuck, etc.) and the North territories of the US (New England, Ohio, Pennsylvannia, etc). The purpose of that divison is to decided witch state will have slave and which will have no slave. Any states that comes into the US below the 36'30 parallel line will become a slave state, and those above the line will be a free state. This will maintain the balance in the government between southern and northern represenatives. It also gave more power to the federal goverment as they can decided wheter or not to let a state join in as slave or free. Instead of having the states choose. Hope that helps:)
Explanation:
Answer:
John Adams did not have enough support from the American people to win his reelection as President in 1800.
There were some serious problems in his presidency, notably the XYZ Affair and the passage of both the Alien and Sedition Acts.Adams's presidency was consumed with problems that arose from the French Revolution, which had also been true for his predecessor. Initially popular with virtually all Americans, the French Revolution began to arouse concerns among the most conservative in the United States after the excesses that commenced in 1792.During the Revolutionary War he served in France and Holland in diplomatic roles, and helped negotiate the treaty of peace. From 1785 to 1788 he was minister to the Court of St. James's, returning to be elected Vice President under George Washington.
Explanation:
but the first part is the answer
John Locke's ideas of the social contract were based on the idea that people have natural rights that are self evident. A government should, according to him, be chosen by the people and if it infringes upon the rights it should be changed. It's seen in the declaration of independence which was heavily influenced by Locke. The first amendment mentions these freedoms and liberties in the form of "freedom of speech", "freedom of religious belief", and freedom of people to assemble and fight for a cause they perceive as just
He was one of the few that did not become consumed with their fame and power over others, he started out as wanting to help the rest of the country and the power did not eat him up; he started wanting to help and ended still trying to help as opposed to being obsessed with the limelight. People such as Robespierre (french revolution leader) started as leaders of a revolutionary club or organization, but realized their power over others and became obsessed with gaining more power instead of continuing their hope for the good of everyone.
