Answer: Among the factors that slowed George Bush's popularity are rising taxes and rising fuel prices.
Explanation:
George HW Bush was President of the United States of America between 1989 and 1993, during his tenure various events of great importance took place, such as the end of the Soviet Union, the fall of the Berlin Wall, the end of the Cold War and the Persian Gulf war.
In 1992 he launched his political campaign for a 2nd term, however, his popularity had decreased due to the increase in taxes during the last year, to the criticism he received about the handling of the Persian Gulf War and the recession that was entering the country. He also received criticism about the increase in fuel prices as a direct result of the Gulf War.
<em>I hope this information can help you.</em>
Answer:
I don't know...call me crazy, but I don't think this would be such a bad idea (at least sometime in the future.) With the advent of the internet, there really is no reason why people can't have more input on legislation. Remember, congressmen act as representatives of the people for logistical reasons. Were voting allowed via internet, mail, or permanent polling places, the logistical roadblocks are reduced.
This country has an annoying quality where senators and representatives are elected and then inject their own personality into their voting. They are supposed to represent the people of their district. If 60% of the people in their district feel a certain way about an issue, why is the congressman/woman allowed to vote a different way? Why do their personal beliefs really matter at all? They are supposed to be voting the way their district wants regardless of what they personally believe.
I know, I know, things can be horribly complicated and the average person can't possibly understand all the issues they are voting on, but last I checked their is no intelligence requirement to be in the government...many people in governement now are dumb as a box of rocks. They don't have to be smart to be elected, they have to be personable and have good advisors working in the background.
Imagine being able to directly vote on education issues, warfare issues, and being able to prioritize budget items. Instead of blaming the morons in congress we would only be able to blame ourselves when things went horribly wrong. Of course, some form of standing governement would still be needed for a lot of reasons.
Again, I know the technology is not hot enough right now to provide the secruity that would be needed, etc, but it won't be long...
The development of spoken language might have influenced the religious beliefs of Stone Age people, as <span>B. Spoken language would have allowed religious beliefs to spread more quickly. Although the spoken language may have made people more suspicious of outsiders, it would not necessarily mean that that suspicion would influence their religious belief, so not A. Although spoken language would eventually create a new class of religious leaders, it would probably not have influenced everybody, as not all people would have the same amount of articulation, so not C. And not D, as cave paintings would have been a form of visual communication.</span>
Stephen F. Austin played the role in the settlement of Texas because he started Texas colony on the lower Colorado river
Answer:
The official British reply to the colonial case on representation was that the colonies were “virtually” represented in Parliament in the same sense that the large voteless majority of the British public was represented by those who did vote. To this Otis snorted that, if the majority of the British people did not have the vote, they ought to have it. The idea of colonial members of Parliament, several times suggested, was never a likely solution because of problems of time and distance and because, from the colonists’ point of view, colonial members would not have adequate influence.
