1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
babymother [125]
3 years ago
8

How did the Magna Carta restrict the power of the king? What benefit did the nobles receive from restricting the king?

History
2 answers:
Rainbow [258]3 years ago
7 0
The Magna Carta meant that 
1) the nobles (the barons) could not be imprisoned without a fair trial (restricting the power of the king to imprison)
2) the king could not raise new taxes without a council of baron's approval (restricting the power of the king to raise new taxes)
Explanation:
The Magna Carta was signed by King of England in June 1215 and was the primary document to inflict legal limits on the king's personal powers. Clause sixty one declared that a committee of twenty 5 barons may meet and overthrow the desire<span> of the king—a serious challenge to John's authority as ruling monarch.
</span>This has been the most<span> concern of the nobles </span>within the<span> years preceding the document </span>as a result of<span> taxes had been raised to fund a war against France. The nobility benefited </span>as a result of<span> the </span>royal charter outlined<span> individual rights and </span>emphasised<span> the role of laws in society. Clause </span>thirty-nine<span> states, </span>for instance<span>, </span>that folks ought to<span> be </span>corrected solely once<span> a ruling by their peers or by the sanctions of the law.</span>

NARA [144]3 years ago
5 0
The Magna Carta meant that

1) the nobles (the barons) could not be imprisoned without a fair trial (restricting the power of the king to imprison)

2) the king could not raise new new taxes without a council of baron's approval (restricting the power of the king to raise new taxes)
You might be interested in
Answer the following questions: 1. What person have you put yourself in the place of? 2. What does this person smell? 3. What do
Deffense [45]
A soilder bad smells. Blood. Swords swinging Feels scared. To give his country more power. Power. Wealth. Land. He will have more resources after
4 0
3 years ago
31.<br> What did the Circuit Court Act do? three examples
mr_godi [17]

Answer:

It created a three-tiered judiciary: the Supreme Court of the United States was to have a Chief Justice and five Associate Justices; next, the United States Circuit Courts were created to act as general jurisdiction trial courts, where one Supreme Court justice and a local judge presided; lastly, each state

Explanation:

5 0
2 years ago
Japans nationalism and rise as an imperial power can be traced back to..... A.) the United States' decision to negotiate trade a
9966 [12]
Answer is C its due to western imperialism
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
4. Which is NOT a tip provided in the article for having
Mnenie [13.5K]

Answer:

The correct answer is D. It is not correct to try to convince the other person to agree with you when having a meaningful political conversation.

Explanation:

When talking about political issues, they often deal with controversial issues that can turn friendly talk into heated discussion. Therefore, as a way to prevent this, there are certain guidelines that must be taken into account.

Thus, not shouting, speaking personally and contemplating the opinion of the other party are fundamental criteria when it comes to having a serious and friendly political debate. In this way, cordiality regulates the content of the talk, and the acceptance of the thought different from the other (without the need to share it) gives legitimacy to the idea of the other person.

On the other hand, if in the conversation one of the parties tries to convince the other of its ideology, the conversation will most likely fail. This is so because when trying to convince, the other person's belief or conviction is discredited, a question that many people can take as a personal insult. Therefore, it is totally inadvisable to carry out this type of actions.

4 0
3 years ago
What was the effect of Marbury vs. Madison ruling on the Constitution and the laws made by legislature?
choli [55]

Answer:

Marbury v. Madison strengthened the federal judiciary by establishing for it the power of judicial review, by which the federal courts could declare legislation, as well as executive and administrative actions, inconsistent with the U.S. Constitution (“unconstitutional”) and therefore null and void.

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What are two ways in which human services organizations find and get finances
    13·2 answers
  • How were hispanics in california affected by the gold rush?
    6·1 answer
  • Democracy is essentially rule of
    13·2 answers
  • Explain what is meant by state rights
    8·2 answers
  • The United States entered World War I hoping to:
    9·2 answers
  • What were some of the causes of economic changes in the United states after ww2?
    14·1 answer
  • What is the main purpose from “Common Sense” made by Thomas Paine in 1776
    10·1 answer
  • "The people are evidently taking every preparations for resistance. They are taking every means to provide themselves with arms"
    8·1 answer
  • 1. Ano ang kahalagahan ng media ang ipinakita ng ang nanay ay bumili ng sabon. A. pagkilos B. pang-aliw C. panghikayat D. pang-i
    9·1 answer
  • Read the poem and answer the question.
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!