In the Civil War, Texas (young Texas) served as a support state, and there was barely any skrimishes in the state. Technically, by the governor's word (The governor at the time was Sam Houston), Texas was originally pro-Union, but the citizens wantes war as a way to assert the state's rights. Also, Texas did not fight for wealthy plantation owners in other states;<u> </u><u>Texas didn't have any cotton plantations compared to the other Southern states, so they didn't suffer as bad as a loss than the other states</u><span>. Moreover, during the battles outside of the state, the Texan soldiers either deserted from warfare or joined the Union.</span>
Answer:
It was called the Stamp Act because the colonies were supposed to buy paper from Britain that had an official stamp on it that showed they had paid the tax. The French and Indian War was fought between the British American colonies and the French, who had allied with the American Indians. It lasted from 1754 to 1763.
Yes.
We have seen, in history, time and again, literature used as a form of resistance.
Literature has the ability to tell stories that powerful people do not want told. As a result, literature can spread and stories can be told that erode the hold of the powerful.
This was a powerful tool in both Soviet Russia and Nazi Germany.
1.d
2.b
3.b
4.a
5.d
are the answers
