The appropriate response is Consent Order. Once the request is fixed it must be changed by shared assent of the now ex and spouse or if another judge chooses it can be changed after an application is made to the court, one individual can't change the terms of the request, it must be by common assent. For most by far of individuals, assent orders are last.
<span>Kevin has analyzed the situation well. However, he should also consider the fact that he saved $10 by only purchasing the shirt.
Opportunity cost is the cost of the forgone alternative. Out of the 3 choices, he only purchased 1 of the choices, the opportunity cost are the other two choices. However, he is still capable of buying the flip-flops costing $10 but he chose not to do so. He should consider it as a savings aside from it being a lost opportunity.</span>
Answer:
$6400
Explanation:
Working capital is the net of current asset and current liabilities. it is a financial measure that gives insight into how liquid a company is considering that it shows whether or not the current assets can be used to settle the current obligations or liabilities of the company adequately.
The change in property, plant, and equipment of $48,000 is not an element of working capital, Hence change in working capital
= $8700 - $2300
= $6400
Answer:
price for selling 3000 share right is $25060.87
Explanation:
Given data:
Total Amount raised= $4,400,000
Spreading rate = 6%
Subscription price = $20 per share
Number of share owned by company = 500,000
Per share cost = $45
Totals share own in the company = 3000
subscription price after deducting spreading rate 
Now, Right share 
Right price is calculated as
Right price = ((Number of share held * market price) + (Right share *Right price))/( Number of share held + Right share)
plugging all value in above relation

Right share = $36.65
single right value = 45- 36.65 = $8.35
Price for 3000 share right = 8.35 *3000 = $25060.86
Answer: D) As stated in our contract,we are liable to pay compensation only when our personnel repair the equipment
Explanation:
Based on the information given in the question, the best way to phrase the refusal of Marie's claim for adjustment is that "As stated in our contract, we are liable to pay compensation only when our personnel repair the equipment".
Since a service executive in the company discovers that the mower was dismantled by someone, then Marie's claim for adjustment can be refused since it wasn't dismantled by someone from the company.