The islamic empire emerged in the seventh century in the arabian peninsula. It was born form the union of the sassanid empire in persia and the byzantine empire, occupying the byzantine provinces of asia and nothern africa ( syria and egypt). its extension reached the iberian peninsula, the island of sicily and other european lands. However, the expansion of their cultured reached india, china, ethiopia, western sudan , southern gaul and constantinople, projecting their influence beyond their terrotorial limits.
I'm not righting a paragraph so you can copy it! buy here is a thesis statement. I agree with Daniel Shay's rebellion because it showed how the national all government has the ultimate power, it revealed the weaknesses of the articles of confederation, and showed how much rights we had. we can peacefully protest without causing harm to others.
Answer:
Yes.
Explanation:
Any source in History can be biased. It can be based on personal opinion, pressure, etc.
Let's take an example. Let's say we want to learn more about Hitler, and we have a primary source that we are analysing. The primary source is a diary entry from a Nazi propagandist, and in the diary entry he talks about how Hitler is like a reincarnation of God, he will lead Germany and the world to greatness and is all in all a great guy.
Straight away, you can tell that that is biased.
So to summarise, anything can be biased. It isn't related to what type of source it is. If you want to analyse and interpret sources, you will need to have lots of different primary and secondary sources at hand, and compare them to find the best answer and analysis.
Hope this helps