Answer;
Nationalism convinced the people of Europe that their own nation could take on any military threat. This was a role nationalism played in the outbreak of world War I.
Explanation;
Nationalism reached a fevered pitch in Europe prior to the first World War. As a political tool, it was the belief that European technological, cultural, economic and military superiority was the cause for the subjugation of more backward economies and cultures.
The pan-Slavic nationalism inspired the assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand in Sarajevo in June 1914, an event that led directly to the outbreak of World War I.
Answer:
Roaring twenties
Explanation:
Roaring twenties was age of political and social change,It lasted from 1920 to 1929 and was followed by the Great depression.
It was the time when more Americans were living in cities than on countryside and US wealth doubled from 1920 to 1929. Due to this economic growth American society became a society of consumers.
The mass consumer culture of 20's also led to economic slowdown. The companies were producing more and offered the goods on easy instalments and this motivated people to spend more and save less and it led to overproduction
Roaring twenties culture was also different from before as women roles has changed. Women had gotten the right to vote and a new liberal young woman emerged whose dressing was more liberal and listened to new form of music called jazz.
I would go with realism bc the definition of it is: the attitude or practice of accepting a situation as it is and being prepared to deal with it accordingly.
I hope this helps you :) also, if you could choose two answers I would go with intellectualism too
Answer:
The Supreme Court decision that decided the 2000 Presidential Election should go down in history as one of the court's most ill-conceived judgments. In issuing its poorly-reasoned ruling in Bush v. Gore, the court majority unnecessarily exposed itself to charges of partisanship and risked undermining the court's stature as an independent, impartial arbiter of the law. Although the court majority correctly identified constitutional problems in the specific recount proceedings ordered by the Florida Supreme Court, the decision to end all recount attempts did immeasurable damage to the equal protection rights the court claimed to be guarding, since it favored a convenient and timely tabulation of ballots over an accurate recording of the vote. In the controversy that followed this decision, some critics of the majority decision argued that the court had no business taking on Bush v. Gore in the first place, that it should have remained solely within the Florida courts (Ginsburg, J. [Dissent] Bush v. Gore [2000]). This paper will argue that the court was correct to intervene but that umm the resulting decision was flawed and inconsistent, with potentially serious, adverse implications for the Federal judiciary if the court continues to issue rulings in this way.
Explanation:
