Well, the Bill of Rights has emphasized urgent morals and philosophies, and protects the United States citizens’ freedom.
For example; the first amendment, also known as the Freedom of Speech (Press, Protest, etc,), allows citizens to vocalize their opinions.
While regarding this topic, there are rights also known as unalienable rights- rights that cannot be taken from you. Example of this would be:
• Life
• Liberty
• Pursuit of Happiness
Each citizen of the United States of America have these rights listed in the Constitution.
I hope this helps!
One major difference between Noah’s and Rector’s historical interpretation of the War on Poverty is Noah described poverty as a societal failure rather than personal moral failings.
Explanation:
In the interpretation of the war on poverty Noah and Rector does not possess same thinking. As Noah thought that poverty is a social curse in which one has nothing to do. War is one of the cause of financial crisis that led to poverty in the society. People used to lose their property, money everything in the war.
On the other side Rector do not think that poverty is a social curse. He thought that poverty is caused to anyone due to the failings of one's personal moral values. He thought poverty can be replenished if anyone's want. It has no power to be heavy on one's life.
Answer: A. The Cherokees won the right to stay on their land and were deemed an independent nation.
<em>(That was a hollow victory though -- see last paragraph of explanation below.)</em>
<em />
Explanation:
The 1832 case, Worcester v. Georgia, ruled unconstitutional a Georgia law requiring non-Native Americans requiring a license from the state to be on Native American land. In responding to the case, the Supreme Court asserted that the federal government is the sole authority to deal with a Native American nation. From this Supreme Court assertion came the beginnings of tribal sovereignty within the United States for Native American nations -- that the US government would deal with them as domestic nations inside the United States.
The court case was named after Samuel Worcester, a Christian minister working among the Cherokee who was supportive of the Cherokee cause. To block the activity of a man like Rev. Worcester, the state of Georgia passed a law prohibiting white persons to live within the Cherokee Nation territory without permission from the Georgia state government. Worcester and other missionaries challenged this law, and the case rose to the level of a Supreme Court decision. The decision by the Supreme Court, written by Chief Justice Marshall, struck down the Georgia law and reprimanded Georgia for interfering in the affairs of the Cherokee Nation. Marshall wrote that Indian nations are "distinct, independent political communities retaining their original natural rights."
But President Andrew Jackson chose not to enforce the court's decision. He said at the time: "The decision of the Supreme Court has fell stillborn, and they find that it cannot coerce Georgia to yield to its mandate." He told the Cherokee that they would need to operate under the jurisdiction of the state of Georgia or else relocate. This was a step in the direction of what became known as the "Trail of Tears," when the Cherokee were removed from Georgia and moved to territory in Oklahoma.
Answer:
B. Coalition
Explanation:
An alliance of two political parties is known as a <em>coalition</em><em> </em>
