Answer:
The "CIVILIZING MISSION" argument
Explanation:
Colonialism is a practice of domination, which involves the subjugation of one people to another. One of the difficulties in defining colonialism is that it is hard to distinguish it from imperialism. Frequently the two concepts are treated as synonyms. Like colonialism, imperialism also involves political and economic control over a dependent territory. The etymology of the two terms, however, provides some clues about how they differ. The term colony comes from the Latin word colonus, meaning farmer. This root reminds us that the practice of colonialism usually involved the transfer of population to a new territory, where the arrivals lived as permanent settlers while maintaining political allegiance to their country of origin. Imperialism, on the other hand, comes from the Latin term imperium, meaning to command. Thus, the term imperialism draws attention to the way that one country exercises power over another, whether through settlement, sovereignty, or indirect mechanisms of control.
The legitimacy of colonialism has been a longstanding concern for political and moral philosophers in the Western tradition. At least since the Crusades and the conquest of the Americas, political theorists have struggled with the difficulty of reconciling ideas about justice and natural law with the practice of European sovereignty over non-Western peoples. In the nineteenth century, the tension between liberal thought and colonial practice became particularly acute, as dominion of Europe over the rest of the world reached its zenith. Ironically, in the same period when most political philosophers began to defend the principles of universalism and equality, the same individuals still defended the legitimacy of colonialism and imperialism. One way of reconciling those apparently opposed principles was the argument known as the “civilizing mission,” which suggested that a temporary period of political dependence or tutelage was necessary in order for “uncivilized” societies to advance to the point where they were capable of sustaining liberal institutions and self-government.
In chronological order from the oldest to the newest the major developments in ancient Egypt ocurred like this:
1. the settlement of the Neolithic farmers 8000 BC
2. Tiles 5300 BC
3. the building of the Step Pyramid 3700 BC
4. the unification of Upper Egypt and Lower Egypt 3100 BC
5. the building of the Great Pyramid of Giza 2580 BC
6. the rise in the belief of life after death 1550 – 1070 BC
Answer: 4) It protected against invasion from the west.
Explanation:
The Nile was the "lifeblood" of ancient Egypt, a river of crucial importance for the emergence and development of ancient Egypt. The source of water, food, and frequent flooding that left fertile soil are ideal conditions for the rise of civilization.
However, the Nile was not a barrier to the war on Egypt, neither from anywhere in the world nor from the west. The Romans marched on this side of the globe, not the territory of Egypt, and put it under their control.
Same tho shsuduhbdudjdjruonrjr
He was arrested because he was accused of having committed war crimes in the Yugoslav wars during the nineties since he was the president of Yugoslavia and ruled during wars against Croatia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, and the fighting against Albanians on Kosovo. He was arrested and taken to Hague where the international court for war crimes is to stand trial for his participation in decision making.
