1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Paha777 [63]
3 years ago
8

Which statement best explains how the balance of state and federal power shifted under President Ronald Reagan?

History
1 answer:
Kay [80]3 years ago
3 0
A) The federal government lost power over the states through the policy of new federalism.

The concept of New Federal was to transfer powers from the US federal government back to the state. The states were allowed to take a more active role in their own affairs.  New federalism involves the federal government providing a block grant to the State to resolve social issues but in return, <span>the federal government would monitor outcome as well as provide broad discretion to the states for how the programs were implemented. </span>
You might be interested in
Martin Luther started the protestant movement when he split from the church in 1517. What are from Europe was he from?
RoseWind [281]
<span>Martin Luther started the protestant movement when he split from the church in 1517 in Germany. He came to reject some of the teaching and practices of the Roman Catholic. The answer is letter D. I hope my answer helps. </span>
6 0
3 years ago
Bad thing about the industrial revolution
yan [13]
<span>The pros of the industrial revolution were that wealth increased overall, more people entered the middle class and quality of living increased for everyone as a result of technology. The cons include pollution, accidental death and overpopulated cities.</span>
8 0
3 years ago
Which was an important event in Italy's path to unification? A. King Victor Emmanuel appointed Count di Cavour prime minister of
Stels [109]
<span>"C. Napoleon and his army established a revolutionary government in Rome"</span> is the best option from the list, but it should be noted that this was only a brief unification.
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Discuss the importance of the Scientific Revolution and how it affected the early Enlightenment Movement?
Sidana [21]

Answer:

The European Enlightenment of the !8th century could not have happened without the previous, and concurrent, Scientific Revolution, and its technological discoveries and inventions, in the !7th and 18th centuries. The Scientific Revolution is the most important event in world history yet most people have never heard of it. A person is unable to understand the world around around them today without at least some basic knowledge of The Scientific Revolution.

There was a small group of philsophers (of the Enlightenment) who really understood that a new world was emerging in Europe in the human understanding of reality. They understood that Man was able to rationally explain Nature for the first time in human history. That God was not actually physically present in Nature. That God, therefore, might not actually exist at all (Atheism). That Man was now in control of Nature. That Man was no longer part of Nature; these were now two separate philosophical realms. That Man was above Nature, even God. And, the big one, the basis of the Enlightenment itself, that Man could remake the world using his rational thought (ideas) without any reference to European history, European tradition or Man as even part of Nature. In other words, wishful thinking born from the dangerous rationalisation of taking ideas to their logical conclusion without any reference to reality.

So, of course, the adoption of these “scorched Earth” or “Year Zero” ideas of the Enlightment was, and still is, a complete disaster for humanity. Especially when combined with the new controlling powers of Science and Technology. The Enlightentment led directly to the first emergence of Left wing politics - that Man is created purely through Nurture, not Nature, and is born as a “blank slate” - with no reference to our 200,000 years of evolutionary adaptation as part of Nature.

This distorted thinking, in turn, led eventually, to the disastrous political and social events of 1968, when even objectivity itself was jettisoned. And, then to the final post-Modern delusion that European culture, art and science is no better than even the most primitive tribes (blank slates) still living in the jungle today.

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Susan Hammond looks desperate as she bursts in your office. She tells you her husband, Tom, was making fake $100 bills in their
Veseljchak [2.6K]
Susan is the one that did it
7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • According to the excerpt, how did the poison gas work to kill the soldiers?
    6·2 answers
  • By september 1947, how many countries had signed up for marshall plan aid?
    14·1 answer
  • Help me please someone!
    6·1 answer
  • How did Eisenhower respond to southern resistance to desegregate schools?
    13·1 answer
  • The volume of the Atlantic Ocean is about 3.1•10^17 cubic meters. The Mississippi River has an annual flow of
    8·2 answers
  • PLS ANSWER MY QUESTION ITS DUE IN 30MIN!?!??!
    14·1 answer
  • What are two <br> things out of three that made men willing to take the risk of exploring
    5·2 answers
  • What were the movement's goals?
    14·1 answer
  • How did the assembly line improve productivity?
    12·1 answer
  • All of the following led to the Renaissance EXCEPT?
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!