The correct answer is <span>a. It convinced Americans that the war wasn't nearly over.
American citizens were led to believe that the communists were losing the war and that everything would end soon. This offensive showed everyone how complex and difficult the situation was and in turn led to loss of support for the war effort by the public.</span>
If I was an ordinary person in my 1930s and aged 40 with a middle income job such as an 'office assistant', I would not be in favour of helping other countries.
I would personally prefer a policy of isolation from the rest of the world. Primarily, this would be because I had seen with my very won eyes, the death and destruction bought on by World War I and more importantly the Great Depression.
With millions of job less people, poverty and people barely making ends meet, I would want our government to concentrate on the welfare of our own people, rather than go to war with countries thousands of miles away.
lowkey heres some short simple answers
1 interest loans
2 in return for keeping their money safe the bank can strike a deal to use ur money and u slowly gain money over time should the money remain in the bank
3 limited liability company or corporation because it helps shield their personal assets from things that might happen in the future
4 The central bank. its there for a flexible and more stable monetary and financial system.
5 it lowers interest rates allowing opportunity for new investments and spending
6 when banks make loans out of excess reserves it increases the money supply
those my half hearted probs wrong answers for you
additional info surrounding Q1 and Q2: The amount of interest the banks collect on the loans is greater than the amount of interest they pay to customers with savings accounts
Not sure if this is an answer choice but it would be Signal
Let me know if this is the correct answer and if you have any other questions that need to be answered.
