1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Oduvanchick [21]
3 years ago
5

In a certain economy, people save some part of their income in the financial sector and use the remaining part for consumption.

The government decides to increase the tax rates for everyone in that economy. What effect will the tax increase have on savings and investment in the economy?
A) Savings decrease, and investment decreases.
B) Savings increase, and investment increases.
C) Savings increase, and investment decreases.
D) Savings decrease, and investment increases.
History
2 answers:
Levart [38]3 years ago
6 0
Savings increase and investment decreases

Aleksandr [31]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

Option A, Savings decreases and investment decreases, is the right answer.

Explanation:

The imposition of tax will decrease the disposable income because disposable income is the one that remains after paying the direct tax and this disposable income is further saved or consumed. However, tax and disposable income are inversely related. Therefore, if disposable income decreases then saving also decreases. Moreover, investment depends on saving. Thus, if the tax rate leads to a decrease in savings then the investment will also decrease

You might be interested in
Native americans were once 100 percent of the population. their descendants now make up roughly 1-2% of the population. why are
andrew-mc [135]

In short, suppression and eradication.

The Protestants of the early United States tended to avoid marrying and continuing the bloodlines of Native Americans due to obvious racial tension and prejudice against them. Native Americans were eradicated on a larger scale in North America rather than South America, so there would be a greater amount of Natives there. (This is because of a more complex and somehow tolerant society in the South) However, there were obviously the mestizos. While there <em>was </em>reproduction between white people and natives, it was typically a result of harassment or an uncommon desire to start a family.

In summary, the amount of Native descendants in the United States is significantly lower now than centuries before because of endless eradication and little amounts of pure-blood Native Americans being born.

5 0
3 years ago
Supporters of the law mentioned in the headline included:
ad-work [718]
Railroad industry which now had laws Government conduct
8 0
2 years ago
In the 1884 presidential election, dissatisfied mugwumps left the Republican Party and threw their support behind
Marysya12 [62]

Answer: b. James A. Garfield.

Explanation:  From  to 1851 to 1854 he studied at the Western Reserve Eclectic Institute [later named Hiram College] in Hiram, Ohio. He then moved to Williams University in Williamstown, Massachusetts, where he was a member of the Delta Epsilon brotherhood. He graduated in 1856 as an exceptional student who excelled in all subjects except chemistry. He later taught classical languages ​​at the Eclectic Institute during the academic year 1856-1857 and was appointed director of the institute from 1857 until 1860. Garfield decided that academic life was not for him and he studied law on his own. He was admitted to the Ohio Bar in 1860. As an anecdote, it should be noted that he was an amateur mathematician and published an original proof of the Pythagorean Theorem [New England Journal of Education]

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Many Mesopotamian states engaged in warfare mainly because.
Rus_ich [418]
Many Mesopotamian states engaged in warfare mainly because "<span>a. They needed to gain access to raw materials through force", since these materials were limited in nature.</span>
7 0
3 years ago
HELPP I'LL MARK BRAINLIST PLEAESEEEE
yuradex [85]

the quote means that u can not do anything in life without anger. I agree with this quote because without anger you can defend yourself in a fight and the world would not be the same without anger.

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What do the terms of the Fifteenth Amendment suggest?
    15·1 answer
  • Which river flows through Mohenjo-Daro and hyderabad?
    14·2 answers
  • Think about your plans to go to college, even if you have never considered it before. What plan would you develop to help pay fo
    5·2 answers
  • When South Korea was invaded by North Korea, direct military assistance to resist aggression came from
    5·1 answer
  • Which faith would a persian person living in iran MOST LIKELY follow
    13·2 answers
  • Which of these is an example of depreciation?
    15·1 answer
  • During the debate over ratification of the United States Constitution, Antifederalists argued that a bill of rights should be ad
    7·2 answers
  • Help please for history class
    11·1 answer
  • What is one thing the 3 colonial regions all have in common
    14·1 answer
  • Which of the following used the metaphor of a
    8·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!