Answer: The father or the children (is) making the noise. 28. The minister, together with his wife, (greets) the children. 29. One of my best friends (is) going on a trip to Greece. 30. Not only the students but also their coach (has) been called to the principal's office. 31. Six years (is) a long time to spend away from your family $2. Either Mary or Alice (is) responsible for this. 33. There (is) fifteen cookies in that packet. Now there (is) only one left! 34. This species of apes (are) found only in Indonesia 35. Both of you (are) enormous potential to succeed in life. 36. Either her brothers or Sudipta water the front lawn every day. (live) across the street. 37. That red-haired lady in the black hat
Explanation:
I Think The answer is d hope it helps
The two types of figurative language that are demonstrated in this text are personification and simile.
When the author states that the “fears came swarming,” it personifies the feeling/emotion by giving it the ability to swarm, as a living creature would, rather than exist usually as an idea. The personification is then further elaborated on by a simile with “swarming about my head like the black flying ants after a storm.” The simile is identified with the use of the word “like” to compare two things or ideas, in this case: fear and black flying ants. The simile compares the effects of the speaker’s fear to the swarming of black flying ants to show how the speaker’s fear is surrounding them entirely. These instances of figurative language create a unique picture in the reader’s mind that allows them to picture the overwhelming nature of the speaker’s fear, adding understanding and depth to the text, while also making the writing more engaging to the reader.
I hope this helps! :)
Answer:
The book contains photocopies of Jefferson’s original letters. Not only are these letters Jefferson’s actual words, but the copies also present his words in his own handwriting. While the page isn’t the actual letter, Jacob is quoting Jefferson’s actual words and thoughts. Therefore, the book is a primary source document.
Explanation:
Two circumstances fits with the question:
1 - if the chapter's authors based their conclusions on their analysis of primary sources related to the Russian Revolution of 1917
2 - if that chapter were being read to understand how American educators taught Russian history in the 1960s.
The 1960s in America were a confusing period under the shadow of the Cold War. The United States and the Soviet Union were fighting ideologically to prove which system - Capitalism or Communism - was the best. Each side attempted to show the problems and mistakes of each economic system, sometimes almost reaching to fight fiscally. Because of all these misunderstandings and attacks of both sides, it's necessary to be careful with all the material produced at that time, especially a textbook, because the content can be tendencious, and mislead the reader. We ONLY could consider this textbook relevant if the authors were correct on their sources, writing based on researches, and if this textbook would be used to understand how Russian history was taught in the 1960s. Because one way or another, this textbook is outdated a lot!
