Answer:
A destroy Europe is the answer
Explanation:
The Great Compromise solved issues between states with small populations and states with large populations.
The Great Compromise was developed at the Constitutional Convention and helped in creating the modern day structure of Congress. In this deal, both states with small populations and large populations got something they wanted. For example, the Senate would be composed of 2 Senators from each state, regardless of their states population. This helped to ensure that smaller states had a voice in the creation of federal laws.
On the other hand, the House of Representatives would have the number of representatives based on a states population. The greater the population, the more representatives. This made larger states happy, as they felt this accurately represented the power they should have in Congress.
People needed food to eat from the farmers. Without food people could starve.
Answer:
The Ottoman Empire was the most religiously diverse empire in Europe and Asia. Macedonia, the southernmost Balkan regions and Asia Minor, which formed historically and in the minds of late Ottoman elites the territorial core of the empire, housed large groups of Christians and a significant number of Jews. Religious diversity characterized the core regions of the Islamic empire. Struck by an existential crisis beginning in the late 18th century, the Ottoman state undertook reforms, declared the equality of its subjects, willingly maintained its diversity and even institutionalised the cultural and religious autonomies which it had given its Christian and Jewish communities. When the Ottoman state failed to defend its territory and sovereignty, the Young Turk Committee of Union and Progress (CUP), the revolutionary rulers who gained power in a coup, finally decided on a program of national homogenization in Asia Minor which it carried out in 1914-1918. The CUP classified the Ottoman populations and dealt with them through resettlement, dispersion, expulsion and destruction – depending on the populations' assimilability into a Turko-Muslim nation in the Anatolian core. It judged the Muslims, in particular the Kurds, assimilable, but the Christian groups non-assimilable.
Explanation:
The correct answer is letter D
In Japan a well-developed feudal regime flourished. It is really one of the glories of that nation to have intuited the principles of wisdom that presided over the foundations of medieval feudalism. To have intuited this in such a way that, comparing the Japanese medieval regime with the medieval regime in the West, there are similarities.
One of the characteristics inherent to the feudal regime is a certain patriarchal sense of the greatness of the feudal lord, as a father and as a protector of those who are his vassals. In the feudal conception - this must be horrifying to the ears of Catholic progressives - the terms father and sir are similar. The father is master of his children. You are the father of your vassals. You assume the full protection of your vassals and defend them against external enemies. Such defense of the vassals is up to the lord rather than the king.
It follows that some notes present in the feudal constructions of the Middle Ages are factors of security, solidity and stability. But, simultaneously, such notes reflect a certain height, a certain challenge, a certain boldness typical of a power that is continually at war. War often led to exaggeration, even against real power. This came to be greatly weakened in Japan, partly because of feudalism, just as it was, at some point in the Middle Ages, in France.
