Answer:
Steve has no legal recourse against Jonathan but he can try to take action against Knell Watches.
Explanation:
The entrustment rule says that entrusting goods to a seller who deals in goods of that kind, gives that seller the power to transfer those goods and all rights to a buyer in the ordinary course of business. Entrusting includes giving your goods to the seller and leaving goods that have already been bought with the seller, with the intention of picking the goods up or having them delivered at a later stage.
Here Steve cannot claim back his watch from Jonathan because he gave the watch to Knell Watches willingly. Jonathan also bought the watch from Kevin in good faith, he had no idea that the watch had been stolen from Knell. Kevin sold the watch to him in good faith and he had no reason to doubt that the watch really belonged to Kevin because they are friends. if, however, someone else had taken the watch in to Knell Watches on behalf of Steve, then he would be able to get the watch back from Jonathan but he can't now because he took the watch in himself. Knell was also deceived by Kevin and so Jonathan is protected because of that according to Uniform Commercial Code.
<em>Answer:</em>
<em>postconventional</em><em> </em>
<em>Explanation:</em>
<em>In psychology,</em><em> the term postconventional morality is described as one of the different levels in the theory of moral development which was proposed by one of the great psychologists named Lawrence Kohlberg. </em>
<em>According to Lawrence Kohlberg, </em><em>postconventional morality is the third and the highest level in the theory of moral development whereby an individual tends to develop his or her personal set of morals and ethics that he or she uses to carry out or led a specific behavior.</em>
<em>As per the question, Kohlberg would suggest that this illustrates the postconventional morality.</em>
Explanation:
Euthyphro first defines "piety" as what he was doing at that time, that is prosecuting Euthyphro's father for manslaughter. His definition of piety was inadequate as Socrates states that it is only an instance or example of piety and not the proper definition of piety itself. It is not able to provide a fundamental characteristic that makes pious things pious.