I believe the answer to this is "true." Really, all conclusions on all events are subjective. But considering history, conclusions on events are especially prone to subjectivity. Consider who writes the history books. If one country wins a war against another country, they will write about themselves as the noble party and portray the enemy as villainous. However, this may not be the real case. This occurs much more than we think, and we must research different events to make sure we are not blindly buying into what people say. Hope this helps.
Answer:
fortunes
Explanation:
because fortunes symbolizes the amount which the writer is talking in
Answer:
Teach-back method.
Explanation:
Teach-back method is exemplified as the communication verification method in which the speakers aim to confirm that their intended message is effectively conveyed to the listener. Therefore, such a method
As per the question, 'teach-back' method would assist in improving the understanding as it employs 'show-me' approach to confirm(through consent process) and evaluate the communication skills of the research assistants who are non-English speakers to adjust the explanation method according to the listener's ability to enhance its impact and efficiency. Thus, <u>'teach-back'</u> method is answer.
The flowers began to blossom, the bees began to buzz, and the cool breeze slid down my neck. I’ve never experienced anything like it, I looked around admiring the new land plot that I was never expecting to experience before !
The answer is <span>originality.</span>
