Leadership is not needed when:
- It will make processes inefficient due to time wasting
- It is being used to oppress people
- Subordinates don't need leadership
Leadership is usually quite good as it can galvanize subordinates to be better workers due to better organization as well as inspiration.
There are instances where it is not needed however such as when:
- It slows down processes - sometimes leaders will need to give permission for a subordinate to do something. If this thing is time conscious and the leader is not available to give their ascent, the whole process could suffer.
- It oppresses people - when a leader is an oppressive one and acts in such a way that their subordinates suffer, that leadership is not needed.
- Subordinates are fine without it - sometimes workers have the necessary skills and experience to operate independently without a leader. In such a case, a leader is not needed.
In conclusion, while a leader is quite important in many ways, there can be situations where it is best that they are not used.
<em>Find out more at brainly.com/question/24150490.</em>
Answer:
1) 18.4%
2) 27.20%
Explanation:
Solution
To get the Expected return for your fund we have to the percentage of Treasury bill and risk premium. That is,
T-bill rate + risk premium = 6.4% + 12% = 18.4%
Standard deviation of client's overall portfolio = 0.80 × 34% = 27.20%
I think the most appropriate answer would be A.
I hope it helped you!
