Incomplete/unclear question. The correct question read;
<u>88% </u>of all Rutgers/Newark students will get drunk this weekend. P2: Booze-Head is a Rutgers/Newark student. Can it be inductively concluded that Booze-Head will not get drunk this weekend?
Answer:
<u>No</u>
Explanation:
<em>Remember,</em> inductive reasoning is often based on<u> broad generalizations from specific observations.</u>
So since from this scenario, a broad generalization was made that <u>88% </u>of Rutgers/Newark students will get drunk this weekend, it seems <u>unlikely </u>and illogical that Booze will not be among those getting drunk on the weekend.
Answer: sexual sadists
Explanation: sexual sadism is a disorder where an individual feel sexual excitement or arousal from inflicting pain, humiliation or suffering on their victims or sexual partners. Sexual sadist offenders are usually obsessed with keeping trophies and excessive violence.
These trophies which might include video tapes, audio tapes, pictures or even diaries can serve as evidence against this offenders in the court of law. So these should be included in a search warrant.