3b^2c^2 is the answer i’m pretty sure
Answer:
Troy ate 7 lollies.
Step-by-step explanation:
You start out by finding how many lollies Troy's two friends ate out of the 24 lollies. To find out how much Tane ate out of the 24 Jet Plane lollies you simply <u><em>divide 24 by the denominator</em></u> --> 24/3=8, <em><u>then you multiply your answer by the numerator</u></em> --> 8x1=8, so Tane ate 8 of the 24 lollies. Repeat this same process for Levi, and your answer should be 9.
Because Tane ate <u>8</u><u> out of the 24</u> lollies and Levi ate <u>9</u><u> out of the 24 lollies</u>, that indicates that <u>17</u><u> out of the 24 lollies</u> are gone (just add your results, 8+9=17). This leaves Troy with only 7 lollies (<em><u>subtract 17 from 24</u></em> to find out how many lollies are left, 24-17=7).
Answer:
44 hours
Step-by-step explanation:
Decreasing the people by a factor of 2 means we have 3 people
The job takes 6* 22 = 132 people hours
When we decrease the people, it will take more hours
132 people hours = 3 people * t hours
Divide each side by 3
132/3 = 3t/3
44 = t
It will take 44 hours
Answer:
idk maybe
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
a) Null and alternative hypothesis:

b) A Type I error is made when a true null hypothesis is rejected. In this case, it would mean a conclusion that the proportion is significantly bigger than 10%, when in fact it is not.
c) The consequences would be that they would be more optimistic than they should about the result of the investment, expecting a proportion of students that is bigger than the true population proportion.
d) A Type II error is made when a false null hypothesis is failed to be rejected. This would mean that, although the proportion is significantly bigger than 10%, there is no enough evidence and it is concluded erroneously that the proportion is not significantly bigger than 10%
e) The consequences would be that the investment may not be made, even when the results would have been more positive than expected from the conclusion of the hypothesis test.
Step-by-step explanation:
a) The hypothesis should be carried to test if the proportion of students that would eat there at least once a week is significantly higher than 10%.
Then, the alternative or spectulative hypothesis will state this claim: that the population proportion is significantly bigger than 10%.
On the contrary, the null hypothesis will state that this proportion is not significantly higher than 10%.
This can be written as:
