How did military leaders prevent democracy in Brazil? Check all that apply.

History

2 answers:

olasank [31]3 years ago

8 0

The Military leaders prevented the democracy in Brazil by,

I) They regulated political parties.

II) They controlled elections.

Further Explanation

The 5th Brazilian republic or the Brazilian Government was a dictatorial military dictatorship that reigns from 1st April 1964 to March 1965. The Military rebel was fostered by Carlos Lacerda, Adhemar De Barros and Magalhaes Pinto executing the governors of the states of the Minas, Guanabara, Gerais, and Sao Paulo. It received assistance from all the high ranking office holders of the military along with the societies' conventional elements like catholic Church and Brazilian common citizens. It also received assistance from the State Department of the United States through its Brazilian embassy.

During this epoch torture and abusement, harassment of journalists, repression on the press became prevalent. The action of the guerilla's movement and anti-government advisory led to the rise in oppressive measures.

The dictatorship continued for 20 years and reached its apex in the 1970s with the so-called “Brazilian Miracle “ The Military torment and arrested the dissenters and even restricting the media during this reign the armed troops got parted into two parts one part in support of the dictatorship and the other upholding communism.

Learn more

Which of the following represents one of congress's electoral powers?brainly.com/question/1907649
Which country was the last to join the allied powers?brainly.com/question/8975931
According to the supreme court, which of these most likely prompted the arrest of the protesters in Edwards v. South Carolina?brainly.com/question/2419144

Answer Details:

Grade: High school

Subject: History

Chapter: Brazil

Keywords: Fifth Brazilian republic Government, authoritarian military, dictatorship, Maglhaes Pinto, Adhemar De Barros, Carlos Lacerda, Minas, Gerais, Sao Paulo, Guanabara, Brazilian embassy, Brazilian Miracle,antigovernment

navik [9.2K]3 years ago

5 0

Military leaders A) regulated political parties and B) controlled elections. They had complete power within politics to sway the elections the way they wanted, and since they had military force, it was difficult to defy them. However, they did not kidnap or kill dissenters, nor did they arrest legislators. The power they displayed was much more diplomatic and strategic than it was physical.

You might be interested in

Describe his argument for liberty. What metaphor does he employ?

faltersainse [42]

The correct answer to this open question is the following.

Unfortunately, you forgot to include the name of the individual who expresses the argument of liberty. Who are you referring to?

It could be anyone, A politician, a founding father, a diplomat, a freedom fighter, a Patriot. Who?

Trying to help you, we can comment on the following.

Doing some research, there is a concept of Liberty expressed by Federalists Founding Father James Madison in one of the Federalist's Papers. James Madison wrote: "Liberty... is essential to [factions] existence”

What Madison tried to say with that quote was that every faction was the product of a way of thinking, of a political belief system expressed with liberty. And that political factions were the result of the ideas of men who freely decided what could be the best for the country and that is why they formed factions or political parties, to support these ideas and present them to the American people.

3 0

3 years ago

What were the consequences of the dawes act

san4es73 [151]

The cause of the Dawes Act was the complete takeover of most of the land of the Native American Indians. Because of this, land belonged to entire tribes, but not individuals. The Dawes Act was created in 1887 to allow surveys of tribal lands and then division of it so that allotments could be given to individual Native American Indians. The Dawes Act was amended twice, both in 1891 and again in 1906. The effect of the Dawes Act was a complete breakdown of the Native American tribes and their traditional way of life. Only the richer clans or families were given land allotments of crop lands. This led to homelessness of many Native American Indians.

4 0

3 years ago

Why did many of President Kennedy's "New Frontier" programs fail?

andrey2020 [161]

D it wAs was the lack of congress support

7 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Is the internet the most important invention in history?

Talja [164]

Answer: well yes because if we did not have internet how would we learn anything and how would we do work

Explanation: have a good summer