1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Scorpion4ik [409]
4 years ago
15

How did military leaders prevent democracy in Brazil? Check all that apply.

History
2 answers:
olasank [31]4 years ago
8 0

<em><u>The Military leaders prevented the democracy in Brazil by, </u></em>

I) They regulated political parties.

II) They controlled elections.

Further Explanation

The 5th Brazilian republic or the Brazilian Government was a dictatorial military dictatorship that reigns from 1st April 1964 to March 1965. The Military rebel was fostered by Carlos Lacerda, Adhemar De Barros and Magalhaes Pinto executing the governors of the states of the Minas, Guanabara, Gerais, and Sao Paulo. It received assistance from all the high ranking office holders of the military along with the societies' conventional elements like catholic Church and Brazilian common citizens. It also received assistance from the State Department of the United States through its Brazilian embassy.

During this epoch torture and abusement, harassment of journalists, repression on the press became prevalent.  The action of the guerilla's movement and anti-government advisory led to the rise in oppressive measures.

The dictatorship continued for 20 years and reached its apex in the 1970s with the so-called “Brazilian Miracle “ The Military torment and arrested the dissenters and even restricting the media during this reign the armed troops got parted into two parts one part in support of the dictatorship and the other upholding communism.

Learn more  

  1. Which of the following represents one of congress's electoral powers?<u>brainly.com/question/1907649 </u>
  2. Which country was the last to join the allied powers?<u>brainly.com/question/8975931 </u>
  3. According to the supreme court, which of these most likely prompted the arrest of the protesters in Edwards v. South Carolina?<u>brainly.com/question/2419144 </u>

Answer Details:

Grade: High school

Subject: History

Chapter: Brazil

Keywords: Fifth Brazilian republic Government, authoritarian military, dictatorship, Maglhaes Pinto, Adhemar De Barros, Carlos Lacerda, Minas, Gerais, Sao Paulo, Guanabara, Brazilian embassy, Brazilian Miracle,antigovernment

navik [9.2K]4 years ago
5 0
<span>Military leaders A) regulated political parties and B) controlled elections. They had complete power within politics to sway the elections the way they wanted, and since they had military force, it was difficult to defy them. However, they did not kidnap or kill dissenters, nor did they arrest legislators. The power they displayed was much more diplomatic and strategic than it was physical.</span>
You might be interested in
Which of the following was not a scandal associated with the harding administration?
Llana [10]
It would be that "c. the chairman of the veterans' bureau laundered nearly 200$ million" that was not a scandal associated with the harding administration, since this in fact happened during the previous term. 
7 0
3 years ago
The combination between religious and political aspects in the Abbasid state's concept of rulership is best reflected in which o
nikklg [1K]

Answer:

D. The Abbasid state was headed by a caliph who was theoretically the state's supreme religious and political leader. ​

Explanation:

Caliphs concentrated in their hands religious and political power. The Abbasid caliphs, who reproached their Umayyad predecessors for behaving like secular rulers, tried to outline their own approach to government in Islamic terms and, accordingly, to the extent that they managed, they tried to adhere to a religious orientation in politics.

8 0
4 years ago
Based on the evidence in this passage from “To build a Fire”, which statement is most likely the theme?
Illusion [34]

what are the choices to pick from?

4 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
2. No southern state voted for Lincoln because
dsp73

Answer:

the answer is B

Explanation:

all of the slave states, which were in the south, did not want slavery to end

3 0
3 years ago
Segregation means that: A. Blacks and whites could sit together on buses. B. Blacks and whites were seprated C. Blacks and white
Furkat [3]

Answer:

B. Blacks and whites were separated.

Explanation:

There were separate seats for blacks and whites before the Civil Rights Act of 1964, and different public facilities. The black people could not go to the same colleges, sport facilities or restaurants whites entered.  That was segregation.

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • During her husband's presidency, Eleanor Roosevelt believed that New Deal work programs should not include women
    15·2 answers
  • The treaty of Versailles
    14·1 answer
  • Which religion became prominent in the Swahili city-states, as evidenced by the places of worship built there?
    7·1 answer
  • Why do you think the workers in these factories accepted these conditions and did not quit?
    11·1 answer
  • What does Socrates say he would like about an afterlife
    5·2 answers
  • Which piece of evidence BEST explains the cause
    12·2 answers
  • I'm not sure if these are right
    7·1 answer
  • The phrases below summarize the primary goals of a political party. which political party has these goals?
    11·2 answers
  • When Palamedes goes to persuade Odysseus to fight the Trojans, Odysseus pretends to be
    5·1 answer
  • Why did the european nations form opposing alliances.
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!