Answer: Yes
Explanation:
The construction company is entitled to compensation because it has a property right to enter and remove minerals.
The investor gave the construction company the right to use the properties on the land, if anything would be done on the land, the construction company should be compensated because they bought the right to do business there. Since the owner granted them the sole right, they are entitled to the resources.
Answer:
13.73%
Explanation:
Effective annual rate = (1 + APR / m ) ^m - 1
M = number of compounding = 365
= 0.1373 = 13.73%
Answer:
Please consider the following explanation
Explanation:
a. EOQ = 560 units
b. 58800 units/560 units = 105 orders
c. EOQ/2 = 560/2 = 280 units (average inventory)
d. 105 orders × $4 ordering cost = $ 420
280 units × $1.50 carrying cost per unit = 420
Total costs = $840
Answer:
opportunity cost
Explanation:
The opportunity cost is the cost that is incurred for purchasing any other thing in place of one thing or we can say it is a sacrification done to purchase another thing
Here in the question it is mentioned that the Lil spent $120 for purchasing a new sweater instead of buying her finance textbooks also the cost of buying the sweater is known as the non doing textbooks cost
So here it is a opportunity cost
Answer:
Answer Illustration : Opportunity Cost of producing Wine is lesser in France, Opportunity Cost of producing Sweaters is lesser in Tunisia. So, France has comparative advantage in Wine, Tunisia in Sweater.
Explanation:
Opportunity Cost is the cost of next best alternative foregone while choosing an alternative.
Opportunity Cost of producing Sweaters & Wine in France & Tunisia are quantities of other goods (Sweaters or Tunias) sacrifised while choosing either. Sweater Opportunity Cost - Wines sacrifised, Wine Opportunity Cost - Sweaters sacrifised.
The country has a comparative advantage in a good if it can produce it with relatively less opportunity cost (in terms of other good sacrifised) than other country.
Ex : Production Possibilities
Wine Sweater Trade off (Wine :Sweater)
France 10 5 1:0.5 or 2:1
Tunisia 8 24 1:3 or 0.33:1
- France produces Wine with lesser opportunity cost (sweater sacrifised) than Tunisia [0.5 sweater < 3 sweaters] ; it has comparative advantage in Wine.
- Tunisia produces Sweater with less opportunity cost (wine sacrifised) than France [ 0.33 wine < 2 wines] ; it has comparative advantage in Tunisia
