<u>Answer:</u>
The phrase "seven, plus or minus two" refers to the capacity of short-term memory.
<u>Explanation:</u>
- Short term memory is also called as active memory or primary memory and refers to the information that we are currently thinking of.
- It generally lasts for short time of few seconds (20 seconds to 30 seconds) and are erased if not rehearsed time and again.
- Short term memory store up to 'seven', plus or minus two words at a time.
- In 1956, Miller performed an experiment and put forward the idea that 'short term memory' can store 5 to 9 items, but modern theory suggests that the information in 'short term memory' can be increased if the information are chunked together.
1. i would say B because its not like the town was destroid so not D
2. i would say D but other countrys probably have destaster and other stoppable power to prevent bad things from happening
3.i would say 1984 meltdown but it could be 2005 hurricane kateina
4. its D because the other things are made by humans
5. i would say FDA because its to keep people safe from poisens and potencys
The sugar act put a three-cent tax on foreign refined sugar and increased taxes on coffee, indigo, and certain kinds of wine. It banned importation of rum and French wines. These taxes affected only a certain part of the population, but the affected merchants were very vocal. Besides, the taxes were enacted (or raised) without the consent of the colonists. This was one of the first instances in which colonists wanted a say in how much they were taxed.
hoped this helped
Answer: (D) Revolution
Explanation:
Revolution is the process of fundamental change in the political power and it basically occur due to the political incompetence.
The revolution basically claimed for the right as the population rejects the monopoly of the government.
There are basically three types of revolution which helps in reshaping the economies and the society are as follows:
- Agriculture revolution
- Information revolution
- Industrial revolution
Therefore, Option (D) is correct.
1. Mrs. Nelson's behaviors: having a social media platform for interacting with parents, allowing her students to use their cell phones, supporting Maddie, and her assurance to Maddie that she was free to love boys or girls, do not violate the Educator Code of Ethics.
2. As a diligent teacher, complying with the Educator Code of Ethics, Mrs. Nelson has not violated any standards by her behaviors and relationships with her students and their parents. The conclusion is because her behaviors and examples are worthy of emulation by other teachers. Teachers should be tech-savvy and ensuring regular communication with parents and students is essential in maintaining good <em>t</em><em>eacher-parents-students relationships</em>.
3. Mrs. Nelson handled this situation well, and she did not violate the Educator Code of Ethics. The code requires ethical and professional responsibility towards students and their parents, without conferring undue advantage to any student based on gender orientation or other considerations.
Thus, Mrs. Nelson is acting ethically and in compliance with the Educator Code of Ethics.
Learn more about the Educator Code of Ethics here: brainly.com/question/4247558