The true correct answer is C my dude
Answer:
Total Return on investment=12.678%≅12.68%
Explanation:
Given;
Number of Shares= 300
Purchasing price of each share=$32.60
Total Dividends= $280
Selling price of each share= $35.80
Find:
Total Return on investment=?
Solution:
Total Return on investment=
Total Return on investment=0.12678
In Percentage:
Total Return on investment=12.678%≅12.68%
Answer:
<em>Incomplete question is "2. What journal entry should Johnson record to recognize bad debt expense for 2021? 3. Assume Johnson made no other adjustment of the allowance for uncollectible accounts during 2021. Determine the amount of accounts receivable written off during 2021 4. If Johnson instead used the direct write-off method, what would bad debt expense be for 2021?"</em>
1. Gross accounts Receivable = Allowance Account balance at beginning / 10%
= $30,000 / 10%
= $300,000
2. Year Account Title Debit Credit
2021 Bad debt expense $105,000
($500,000*10% + $55,000)
To Allowance for Doubtful Accounts $105,000
3. Accounts receivable written off = Beginning balance of Allowance Account - Ending Balance of Allowance account
= $30,000 - (- $50,000)
= $30,000 + $50,000
= $80,000
4. Bad debt expense for 2021 (direct write off method) = Amount written off = $80,000
Answer:
166.25 hours
Explanation:
It take 25 hours if the production is going at 100% capacity, but the production is only going at 67%, therefore, 33% of the capacity is under utilized. It takes 8.25 more hours to finish the unit since the capacity is only at 67%. Finally, it takes 25+8.25 hours to finish a single product, hence taking 166.25 hours for 5 units.
We do this like this:
--> 25 ------ 100
--> X ------ 33
--> 33*25 = 100*X
--> 825/100
--> X=8.25
Hope this clears everything. Thankyou.
Answer:
Select the answer that best describes the strategies in this game.
- Both companies dominant strategy is to add the train.
Does a Nash equilibrium exist in this game?
- A Nash equilibrium exists where both companies add a train. (Since I'm not sure how your matrix is set up I do not know the specific location).
Explanation:
we can prepare a matrix to determine the best strategy:
Swiss Rails
add train do not add train
$1,500 / $2,000 /
add train $4,000 $7,500
EuroRail
do not add train $4,000 / $3,000 /
$2,000 $3,000
Swiss Rails' dominant strategy is to add the train = $1,500 + $4,000 = $5,500. The additional revenue generated by not adding = $5,000.
EuroRail's dominant strategy is to add the train = $4,000 + $7,500 = $11,500. The additional revenue generated by not adding = $5,000.
A Nash equilibrium exists because both companies' dominant strategy is to add a train.
