Answer and Explanation:
The text above presents a speaker who recognizes that he participates in physical activities and sports that can cause injuries, accidents and compromise his health, but the speaker shows that there are ways to avoid these problems, allowing him to enjoy the best that these activities can offer .
Then the narrator begins to show what he can do in each activity to help him avoid injuries and accidents, in addition, he shows alternative activities that he can do and that are safer.
Answer:
The correct answer would be C, The plot of the story.
Explanation:
The plot of a story describes the events that take place as well as the conflict or problem that must be resolved.
The plot of a story is basically the sequence of the events that happens as we go further into the story. Why things happen, why the characters in the story do certain things or take certain decisions, all such things make plot of the story which makes the reader understands about why the character made this choice. A plot is basically the structure in which the events of the story are arranged.
Answer:
self-destruction
Explanation:
It seems as if this is a self-destruction , why?" The man's
hands were behind his back, the wrists bound
with a cord. A rope closely encircled his neck." His hands being behind his back with his "wrist bound with a cords," is basically letting you know that he made up his mind, and that there's no turning back, and a rope is "closely encircled his neck," which explains that he's choking himself.
Read "What makes good people do bad things?", by MELISSA DITTMANN
Which statement best supports Zimbardo’s belief that people are not born “good” or “evil”?
A
. “‘Any of us can move across it... I argue that we all have the capacity for love and evil — to be Mother Theresa, to be Hitler or Saddam Hussein.’” ( Paragraph 3)
B
. “In one condition, they overheard an assistant calling the other students ‘animals’ and in another condition, ‘nice.’” ( Paragraph 8)
C
. “The same social psychological processes… that acted in the Stanford Prison Experiment were at play at Abu Ghraib, Zimbardo argued.” ( Paragraph 16)
D
. “As such, the Abu Ghraib soldiers' mental state… may have further contributed to their ‘evil’ actions, he noted.” ( Paragraph 18)
Answer: A
. “‘Any of us can move across it... I argue that we all have the capacity for love and evil — to be Mother Theresa, to be Hitler or Saddam Hussein.’” ( Paragraph 3)
Explanation:
Zimbardo claims that the line between good and evil is permeable, meaning that people are not born “good” or “evil”. On the contrary, everyone can cross that line, especially under certain circumstances. For example, the soldiers´ mental state and the lack of supervision, training, or accountability led to the abuse of an Iraqi prisoner in Abu Ghraib.
