1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Luda [366]
3 years ago
7

In a group discussion, which of these is the best example of challenging the credibility of a source?

English
2 answers:
Rzqust [24]3 years ago
4 0

Answer: Given that the author reveres Valmiki as a prophet, I don't think we can count on his objectivity.

Ipatiy [6.2K]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

A. Given that the author reveres Valmiki as a prophet, I don't think we can count on his objectivity.

Note that reveres pretty much means "worship", and if the author reveres Valmiki, it means that the author's opinion is positive, and is not objective.

Objective means giving information without including one own's opinions or "feelings", and only giving the facts.

~

You might be interested in
Uninstalling this app
adell [148]
Ok nice for you what is your actual question have any
6 0
3 years ago
if you are one of officiating, what do you think are the challenges you've encountered in officiating the game ?​
vovangra [49]

Answer: Being an official means that you have to be fair to both sides. The challenges I encountered as the official are when a player purposely hits another player, the correct signs I must use on the game are also challenging.

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Which two of these statements explains how international trade affect consumers?
wolverine [178]
Answer: B and D

Let me know if i’m right!
8 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which is important to know when writing a critical annotation of a research essay?
Lelu [443]

When writing a critical annotation of a research essay it is important to known that, Does the author support her position with reliable data?

Answer: Option A.

Explanation:

Critical annotation is a type of writing which criticizes the work from an enlightened point of view. The effectiveness of critical annotation is based on both the positive and negative aspects of the topic. When it comes to writing a critical and annotation of a research paper, it is necessary to make sure that the author is trustworthy and that he has made use of reliable sources. It is important to examine the credibility and the reliability before beginning with a critical annotation of any research paper.

6 0
3 years ago
Informal letter to a friend<br><br>​
tensa zangetsu [6.8K]

Answer:

Here is an informal letter. Hope this will help.

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which is a complete sentence?
    5·1 answer
  • Which two words does Shakespeare combine to form the contraction "make's
    15·1 answer
  • Krumpers __________ their way to the final competition.
    12·1 answer
  • Which excerpt best reflects the central idea of the “Official Symbolism” excerpt from the Iroquois Constitution?
    7·1 answer
  • I hope everybody has an amazing day.<br>Everybody deserves a good day. ♡ <br>​
    8·1 answer
  • Which of these is NOT a theme in "Romeo &amp; Juliet"?
    5·2 answers
  • They used to laugh with their heart literature
    12·1 answer
  • The free application that students must complete to receive federal student
    6·1 answer
  • Three types of literature characteristics of the 20th century
    9·1 answer
  • Choose the correct sentence. *
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!