Answer:
He thought they were very green and did not have many supplies. His troops were poorly trained and lacked food, ammunition and other supplies
Explanation:
<em>Plessy v. Ferguson</em> (1896) was a Supreme Court decision that upheld the principle of "separate but equal" in regard to racial segregation. The Court's decision said that separate, segregated public facilities were acceptable as long as the facilities offered were equal in quality.
In the decades after the Civil War, states in the South began to pass laws that sought to keep white and black society separate. In the 1880s, a number of state legislatures began to pass laws requiring railroads to provide separate cars for passengers who were black. At the heart of the case that became <em>Plessy v. Ferguson</em> was an 1890 law passed in Louisiana in 1890 that required railroads to provide "separate railway carriages for the white and colored races.”
In 1892, Homer Plessy, who was 1/8 black, bought a first class train railroad ticket, took a seat in the whites only section, and then informed the conductor that he was part black. He was removed from the train and jailed. He argued for his civil rights before Judge John Howard Ferguson and was found guilty. His case went all the way to the Supreme Court which at that time upheld the idea of "separate but equal" facilities.
Several decades later, the 1896 <em>Plessy v. Ferguson </em>decision was overturned. <em>Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka</em>, decided by the US Supreme Court in 1954, extended civil liberties to all Americans in regard to access to education. The "separate but equal" principle of <em>Plessy v. Ferguson</em> had been applied to education as it had been to transportation. In the case of <em>Brown v. Board of Education</em>, that standard was challenged and defeated. Segregation was shown to create inequality, and the Supreme Court unanimously ruled segregation to be unconstitutional.
Answer: Getting away from discrimination in America
We
can define the reasons that why United states have a bicameral congress in historical, practical and theoretical way. If we look
at the historical reason we see that the British Parliament had consisted of
two houses since the 1300s, and if we see practically, the Framers
had to make a two-chambered body to settle down the conflict that is between
the Virginia Plan ( in this plan, there are two houses of congress and the
population will determine the representation in each house) and the New Jersey
Plan (in this plan there is a single house of Congress and each state would have
an equal vote) <span>at Philadelphia in 1787 and theoretically the farmers
preferred a bicameral congress in a way that one house of congress would have
check on the other house.</span>
Answer:
Having entered the war to support its allies, they believed Russia should maintain its commitment until a final victory was achieved. Others believed that surrender or negotiated peace with Germany would jeopardise Russia's international standing.
