Nabokov organized his essay in an exceedingly typical manner; he states his plan then uses proof to support it. He additionally explains his read on what makes a decent author initial then what makes a decent reader. This is smart as a result of one should initial perceive the author before understanding the reader. He uses samples of what created a decent author to clarify what would create a decent reader. “The writer is the initial man to mop it and to form the natural objects it contains (…) The panting and happy reader, and there they spontaneously embrace and are linked forever if the book lasts forever.” This possibly implies that a good author makes a cheerful reader. so a cheerful reader is one that has understood the piece clearly, creating them a good reader. author then offers his definition of literature before closing the essay, giving the reader that last little bit of information that wraps literature, the reader, and also the author all at once, “To the story teller we turn for entertainment, for mental excitement of the simplest kind, for emotional participation,for the pleasure of traveling in some remote region in space or time.”
Answer: D. to inform readers about Blair's apology
Explanation:
The article excerpt provides information about Blair's apology in an unbiased way, meaning that it doesn´t intend to convince the reader of whether an apology was in order or not.
Option A is incorrect because the idea that British diplomats had allegedly been working non-stop is how Blair, and not the article, intends to persuade people not to blame them. Option B is incorrect because the article doesn´t ask or even hint for people to help British survivors. Option C is incorrect because the article is not meant to explain why Britons were deserted, but to inform how Blair considers they were not deserted at all.
<span>d.Hal Holbrook
</span>a.Height of fashion
<span>a.W.S. Gilbert
</span>
