Answer:
First Paragraph:
The events leading to the Boston Massacre weren’t amazing. First, there was the Stamp Act Congress in 1767. These were designed to raise money. The Stamp Act Congress were the original people to let colonies protest the British law. However, the document says that this couldn’t pass because this wasn’t represented by British government. Next, there was the Townshend Act in 1767. This was also designed to raise money. This was put on things like glass, lead, paint, and tea. This led to the Boston Tea Party in 1773. Some patriots decided to dress up as Natives and protest this act and destroy ships full of tea and throw it overboard. They were punished by the government putting out another act. In 1774, The First Continental Congress met up and wrote to the king how angry they were about the tea.
Second Paragraph:
On the night of March 5th, 1770, British soldiers in the Massachusetts bay started firing on a large group of colonists. The soldiers stood in front of the Customs House. The soldiers stood there to stop were there to stop validation up against the Townshend Acts. However, they failed making everyone extremely angry. I don’t believe they were accountable for the murder. They were just acting in self-defense.
Explanation:
Answer:
C + D
Explanation:
I realized just as I was about to send this that you got the question wrong. I am so sorry!
Pros:
- More advanced in warfare
-More soldiers
-Having factories provide for the Union
- Leadership Advantage
-Larger Population
Cons:
-Barley knew their way around Confederacy lands
- Under high pressure
- Not everyone was in favor
The question ask to state what the suspect do at show trials during the great purge, and base on my research and further investigation, I would say that they often admitted to fault even when they were completely innocent, in the hopes of receiving a reduced sentence or avoiding the labor camps in the East. I hope this would help
Land masses formed barriers and only 1 path allowed trade
