Because it kind of goes with the story
When we look back in the past of Chilean literature, Manuel Rojas, started his writing career in between the naturalist movement. To understand more, we can relate realism and naturalism. First, naturalists' writing involved an extreme portrayal of realism which focused more on barbaric attributes of the human race. And then, the characters included in such stories belonged to the bottom of the society, with an unsavory description.
We notice a non-participant narrator in this tale of kindness. He's a third-person narrator who is limited to the visuals and physical activities of the characters but has no access to their thoughts. However, he describes the mentality of the young boy. This effect is created to focus more on the conditions and their impact, on the miserable life.
Through this, it is easy to infer that the third choice would get you the best marks.
=> The use of third-person limited point of view allows the reader to better understand the main character.
Answer:
What will Hal do in 2019?
What will he achieve by then?
How long will he live in Los Angeles in 2022?
What will he do by the time he moves to Los Angeles?
When will he buy a house?
What will he write in 2023?
Explanation:
Answer:
C
Explanation:
First, punctuation in a quotation is always inside the double quotes ruling out option B. Then, before you write a quotation you must include a comma after the intro clause. Thus, C is the only right answer.
Hope this helped :)
