Opposition to approval of the Constitution made by the Anti-Federalists was grounded on the belief that it would Question 2 opti
ons: encourage pluralism, which would threaten liberty be too democratic in a strong central government. grant too much power to the states keep elites in power, endanger liberty especially for individuals, and weaken the states
Answer: Keep elites in power, endanger liberty especially for individuals, and weaken the states.
The Articles of Confederation, in place prior to the ratification of the Constitution of the United States of America, had granted stronger authority to the states. Patrick Henry and other Anti-Federalists were concerned about too much power winding up in the hands of the federal government and its executive branch, thus allowing a small number of national elites to control the affairs of the USA. They feared this also would diminish the rights and freedoms of individual citizens.
The Bill of Rights, laid out in the first ten amendments to the Constitution, provided some reassurance to Anti-Federalists after the fight over ratification. The US Constitution was ratified in 1788. The Bill of Rights was created in 1789 and ratified in 1791.
The correct answer is keep elites in power, endanger liberty especially for individuals, and weaken the states.
The Anti-federalists were a group of individuals who feared a too strong central government in America. Their fears about this type of tyrannical government were rooted in their experience as colonists under the control of the British government. This is why the Anti-federalists were in favor of a Bill of Rights. This Bill of Rights would explicitly state what rights citizens possessed in order to prevent the federal government from taking these rights away.
Giuseppe Maria Garibaldi was an Italian general, patriot and republican. He contributed to the Italian unification and the creation of the Kingdom of Italy.
Its the last one; you have to be given a reason as to why you are being arrested. However, the president can suspend habeas corpus for good reason and the only one that ever did that was Lincoln and he locked up reporters who were writing harmful criticism against the war and him. Lincoln's approval rating was never good during his presidency and imagine if Nixon did that to like hippies that were protesting the war...
