Answer:
I think the answer is.............
1) Lázaro Cárdenas (1934-40).
2) In the wake of the First World War, the non-interventionist tendencies of U.S. foreign policy were in full force.
Explanation:
I hope this help and if isn't right I am sorry.
<span>Due to the fact that these countries had many untapped resources and capabilities at hand, the emergence of trade routes and economic activities was crucial to the development of these countries. This is especially true when seeing the rural components within their community prior to the onset of trade.</span>
Because they had no influence over the budget and military.
In Hamilton's words that would be "no influence ever either the sword or the purse". He argued that because of this the judiciary would be the least threatening branch of the government and that it had to rely on both other branches to uphold its rulings and decisions. In Federalist No. 78 he also states what powers and responsibilities the judicial branch would have.
Creating a connection between world or countries ✨
The rewritten Japanese constitution guaranteed "<span>personal freedoms," since the Allied Powers after World War II felt that a more free people would be less likely to militarize. </span>
