1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Ghella [55]
3 years ago
12

What main arguments does Churchill present that he uses to describe the failure of appeasement?

History
1 answer:
zloy xaker [14]3 years ago
5 0
In his seminal and award winning book, gathering the storm, Churchill postulates that he had warned that appeasement provided an ample opportunity for Hitler to re-arm. He thus called a fast rearmament of the British RAF.
You might be interested in
57:40 The law that made it a crime to criticize the government was the Alien Enemies Act. Naturalization Act. Jay Treaty. Sediti
Sophie [7]

Answer:

Option D (Sedition Act) would be the correct approach.

Explanation:

  • The above Sedition act, 1918, has been the statute that rendered opposing the administration another misdemeanor.
  • Such utilization of some kind of mendacious, peculiar, as well as violent terminology, would be further forbidden. The statute also became concerned with several other punitive clauses.

The other alternative is not linked to something like the procedure outlined. So the alternative above is the right one.

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What was the first French fort built during the French and Indian war?
Ira Lisetskai [31]

Fort Duquesne was the first french fort built during the french and Indian war

3 0
3 years ago
What was a cause of the French and Indian War?
Aleksandr-060686 [28]

Answer:

The French and Indian War began over the specific issue of whether the upper Ohio River valley was a part of the British Empire, and therefore open for trade and settlement by Virginians and Pennsylvanians, or part of the French Empire.

Explanation:

your welcome please give brainlist

5 0
3 years ago
How was India shaped by political disunity and contacts with other cultures during the
Rudik [331]

Answer:

After the Mauryan Empire fell, no one major power held control over a substantial part of India for five hundred years. Rather, from c. 200 BCE to 300 CE, India saw a fairly rapid turnover of numerous, regional kingdoms. Some of these were located in northern India, along the Ganges River, but others grew up in the south—the Indian Peninsula—for the first time. Also, some kingdoms emerged through foreign conquest. Outsiders in Central Asia and the Middle East saw India as a place of much wealth, and sought to plunder or rule it. Thus, throughout its history, India was repeatedly invaded by conquerors coming through mountain passes in the northwest. Many of these, like King Kanishka of the Kushan Empire (c. 100 CE), established notable kingdoms that extended from India into these neighboring regions from which they came.

Even after 300 CE and up to the fifteenth century, India was never again unified for any length of time by one large empire. For that reason, historians highlight those kingdoms that became substantial regional powers and contributed in other important ways to India’s civilization. The period 300 – 600 CE, for instance, is often referred to as the Gupta Period and Classical Age. The Guptas (c. 320 – 550) were rulers who forged an impressive empire in northern India. As their empire flourished, Indian intellectuals were also setting standards for excellence in the fields of art, architecture, literature, and science, in part because of Gupta patronage. But important kingdoms also developed in south India.

The last period covered in this chapter is early medieval India (c. 600 – 1300 CE). After the Gupta Empire, and during the following seven centuries, the pattern of fragmentation intensified, as numerous regional kingdoms large and small frequently turned over. Confronting such an unstable and fluid political scene, medieval kings granted land to loyal subordinate rulers and high officers of their courts. The resulting political and economic pattern is referred to as Indian feudalism. Also, kings put their greatness on display by waging war and building magnificent Hindu temples in their capital cities. And, during the medieval period, a new political and religious force entered the Indian scene, when Muslim Arab and Turkic traders and conquerors arrived on the subcontinent.

This overview briefly summarizes major periods in India’s political history. But the history of a civilization consists of more than just rulers and states, which is why historians also pay close attention to social, cultural, and economic life every step of the way. This attention is especially important for India. Although the Asian subcontinent sees a long succession of kingdoms and empires and was usually divided up by several at any particular point in its history, peoples over time came to share some things in common. Socially, the peoples of India were largely organized by the caste system. Culturally, the peoples of India shared in the development of Hinduism and Buddhism, two major religious traditions that shaped people’s understanding of the world and their place in it. Finally, throughout the ancient and medieval periods, India flourished as a civilization because of its dynamic economy. The peoples of India shared in that too, and that meant they were linked in networks of trade and exchange not only with other parts of South Asia but also with neighboring regions of the Afro-Eurasian world.

7 0
4 years ago
PLEASE PLEASEEE HELP ME I NEED HELP!!
Wittaler [7]
  1. The main purpose of the illustration was to label the events occurred in King Street (Boston) on March 5, 1770, as an unfair and depict the coward treatment from the British Government towards unarmed US colonials.
  2. It is known that images are a powerful tool to describe the events that happened during a particular period in history. This resulted in a very effective mean by which the Patriots publicized what occurred among the residents of the colonies.
  3. Paul Revere used this illustration as a tool to generate discomfort among the residents of the colonies and instigate a rebellion against the British Empire due to their unfair way of handling policies within the colonies.  
6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Historical understanding is built on _____.
    8·2 answers
  • Read this passage, noting which details are relevant, and which are unnecessary.
    11·2 answers
  • Why did Bismarck try to limit the influence of the Catholic Church and socialists?
    10·2 answers
  • How did muhammad link religion and government
    13·1 answer
  • Explain why the Apache and Navajo didn't have totem poles
    6·1 answer
  • Help. Just read that-​
    13·1 answer
  • Who was Thea 40 president of American
    9·1 answer
  • What war is currently going on in our world where people have different opinions?
    8·2 answers
  • On the 10 Commandments describe a person who lives their life according to God‘s law
    10·1 answer
  • Compare and contrast the roles of slaves and freemen in the Roman Republic In Only Three Sentences.
    10·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!