With regards to whether imperialism was a fair excuse for the Industrial Revolution, the answer is that <u>it was not. </u>
<u />
<h3>What was the relationship between imperialism and the Industrial Revolution?</h3>
- Raw materials were needed to produce more goods and so colonies were acquired to get these goods cheaply.
- New markets were needed to sell the goods produced as well.
Both of these are not good enough excuses for imperialism because these nations could have engaged in fair and mutually beneficial trade that would have led to both the colonized nations, and themselves, developing.
Find out more on imperialism at brainly.com/question/353575.
I would disagree with the statement "United States vs. Nixon expanded the power of the presidency." In reality, it shrank the power of the president.
In this Supreme Court case, Richard Nixon refused to give up taped conversations he had from the Oval Office. Nixon claimed that this action was protected by the idea of "executive privilege." This meant that because he was president, he had the ability to keep these tapes from going to the courts. However the Supreme Court, in a unanimous vote, stated that the president must give up the tapes. This showed that no person was above the law, including the president. This shows that the presidents are responsible to the courts and do not have special protection in legal cases.
The populist movement stand farmers.
<span>Assuming that this is referring to the same list of options that was posted before with this question, <span>the correct response would be the "Alien and Sedition Acts", since these were passed to limit the free speech of individuals, especially speech that could paint the government as being bad. </span></span>
Generally, the term criollos refers to the people of Latin America who were not of strict European descent--meaning that they were born in Latin America to either natives or "mixed" blood.
