Explanation:
Ethical communication has several principles or foundational elements. Communicating fact-based messages honestly and accurately is central to ethical communication. Ethical communication values freedom of expression, diversity of perspective and tolerance of dissent. But while ethical communication should be honest and straightforward, it should never offend or provoke listeners.
Ethical communication allows access to the resources and facts that helped formulate the message. For example, if you are sharing information about stock performance, you are obligated to provide your audience with annual reports, filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission or shareholder reports.
Communicating in an ethical manner also requires making the message accessible. This means if you are delivering a message to a large or diverse audience, ensure that you accommodate the languages and listening preferences of everybody. Even though the official language in the U.S. is English, there are millions of visitors and legal residents whose first language is not English. To deliver a message that can be understood by a diverse audience requires engaging linguists or translators who can assist you in making the message accessible to all.
In addition to making the message accessible and respecting the diversity of thought and perspective, ethical communication means being considerate of basic human needs. Avoiding words and language that are demeaning or intolerant and refraining from messages that promote or incite violence is paramount to ethical communication.
Answer: A. Several publications in the mid 1800s made the cruelties of slavery public in the north.
The Missouri Compromise of 1820, which allowed Missouri to become a slave state, further increased anti-slave sentiment in the Northern states. The abolitionist movement began as a more organized, radical and immediate attempt to end slavery than earlier movements.
<u>Answer:</u>
B: Spain was a weaker nation and France a stronger one.
This was the result of the Thirty Years' War.
<u>Explanation:</u>
There were various reasons, religious, territorial and commercial rivalries which led to a thirty-year war, from 1618 to 1648 in European’s history. It started with the Holy Roman emperor imposing Roman Catholic absolutism on his domains and the protest of Bohemians and Austrians to the same.
Various other political reasons kept fueling the war between Poland, Spain, Russia, Moscow. In all these conflicts, Germany suffered the most. So, it couldn’t become a unified state. At the end, peace of Westphalia recognized Europe as an organisation of equal independent states. France emerged as the strongest nation as Spain was hurt badly.
Answer: criollos
Explanation: I don’t have a good explanation but I know that’s the answer.
Answer
Nations at war targeted neighboring nations of the enemy as an offensive strategy
Explanation:
The alliances were made so you had support if a war broke out. Germany during World War I was known for its offensive strategy due to a strong nationalism. They also had imperialist ideas about creating a great Germany. The other nations was forced to declare war on Germany as they made a pact with Austria-Hungary. When Germany made that pact and helped Austria-Hungary, the other alliances was forced to fight Germany as a defensive strategy against them.
