1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Anastaziya [24]
3 years ago
14

How is the modern era different from the postclassical era?

History
2 answers:
wolverine [178]3 years ago
8 0

The difference between the two eras is that: The Modern Age is the third of the historical periods in which universal history is conventionally divided, between the fifteenth and eighteenth centuries. Chronologically it harbors a period whose beginning can be fixed in the fall of Constantinople (1453) or in the discovery of America (1492), and whose end can be placed in the French Revolution (1789) or in the end of the previous decade, after the independence of the United States (1776). However, the Postclassic period begins around the year 800 and ends in 1521, when the Spaniards took the capital of the Aztec empire. The phenomenon that characterizes the Postclassic is the invasion of Mesoamerica by semi-nomadic peoples that came from the north, from the vast expanse of Aridoamerica. These people settled in Mesoamerica, mixed with ancient assimilating settlers many elements of classical cultures. With time, they would create a new civilization, comparable to the most advanced of the American continent.

maria [59]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

In the postclassical era, the world's most powerful states were in Asia and the Middle East. In the modern era, power shifted to Eurasia

Explanation:

You might be interested in
When the British captain asked Jones if he was ready to surrender, what was Jones's response?
Korolek [52]

Answer: "I have not yet begun to fight!"

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why did opposition to the Vietnam War increase over time? Was this justified?
Triss [41]
Opposition increased over time because american citizens had kept seeing the results of the war. For example, like increased funding, many deaths, and lost a lot of battles. As the war continued and the US was not progressing any in defeating North Vietnamese forces, Americans began to view the fighting as pointless due to all the consequences. I believe it was justified, because the outcomes could have been avoided if peace with Vietnam was settled earlier or if the US didn't even get involved.  
8 0
3 years ago
Why does japan attack foreign counties in ww2?
Sedaia [141]
From 1941 onwards: The Japanese attacked Western colonies in the Far East, conquering the countries and subjugating the natives to a treatment far worse and more barbaric than the colonial power ever inflicted. While they targeted the colonies of countries already themselves conquered by Germany, so as to assure themselves of easy victories, they also attacked British colonies knowing full well the cream of British manpower was engaged in the German war, and her far east colonies only had a skeleton garrison of second or third line troops. Countries attacked in this way:-

Holland (Dutch East Indies)
France (French Indochina, Cambodia, Laos, Vietnam)
Great Britain (Hong Kong, Malaya, Singapore, Burma, our Pacific Island colonies such as the British Solomon Islands, Borneo)
the United States (the Philipines, Wake Island)
Australia (Australian protectorates such as New Britain and neighbouring countries such as Borneo)

The battle-plan was to sweep into India, driving out the British, (with a not unfounded possibility of meeting the Germans coming the other way out of north Africa into the middle east). To press attacks on the United States by capturing Hawaii and threatening the USA's western seaboard. To drive south into an Australia and New Zealand weakened by most of their fighting armies being under British command half a world away in the German war. (Ultimately, Australia and NZ were to have been dispossessed of whites and settled as an extension of Japan by Japanese)

3 0
3 years ago
What factors made possible the growth of the few southern states
NNADVOKAT [17]

Answer:

Cash crops?

Explanation:

It allowed them to grow economically??

Need more details

8 0
3 years ago
If you convinced your principal to cancel an assembly because of a political concern what would this situation be an example of?
Furkat [3]
<span>The answer would be Rhetoric. This is the research of real talking and writing. And the art of persuading. And many extra things. In its extended and strong history rhetoric has liked many meanings, housed opposing purposes, and diverse extensively in what it comprised. </span>
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Who was the totalitarian ruler of Nazi Germany?
    5·2 answers
  • How would controlling the religious authorities allow the absolute monarch to maintain or consolidate power?
    5·1 answer
  • Which authors work gave support to the abolitionist movement before the civil war?
    14·1 answer
  • What two things did former British prime minister Winston Churchill affirm in his Iron Curtain speech?
    12·2 answers
  • What two farming groups helped push reform and help form the Populist Party?
    13·1 answer
  • Who partnered with President Roosevelt in pushing the new deal programs?
    12·1 answer
  • What is the most immediate) goal of nonviolent resistance?
    6·1 answer
  • If you had to choose between Renaissance art, humanist writers, and the invention of the printing press, which one has had the m
    5·1 answer
  • What are 5 facts about the stamp act
    6·2 answers
  • 3. what two strategies did minority actors use in early media in order to
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!