I'm pretty sure it's they both focus on listed aspects of the authors life.
The way the author unfolds a series of events allows the creation of a logical sequence, which allows the reader to understand where the idea of climbing Mount Everest came from, the difficulties, conflicts, and resolution of this idea.
In other words, the events create a sequence that allows the book plot to advance.
Regarding "The Final Assault" we can say that:
- The book portrays the dangers and emotions of climbing Mount Everest.
- The narrator shows the apprehension of climbing the hill from the moment the idea emerged.
- However, the narrator is excited and with a strong expectation of being successful.
- After that, a series of events takes place, giving movement to the plot and showing all the consequences of this idea.
- This creates a logical sequence, which shows how events are organized until the end of the book, being able to trigger different emotions in the reader.
With this, we can conclude that the presentation of events in a sequence is a way to show linearity in the story, allow the plot to advance, and control the readers' emotions.
More information:
brainly.com/question/6110309
<span>Thomas Paine was an English-American <u>ACTIVIST</u> who wrote pamphlets that influenced many people and were instrumental in starting the american revolution. He skillfully communicated the ideas of the revolution to everyone, from farmers to intellectuals.
Since the purpose of the paragraph is to inform the word that best fits in the blank is the word "activist," it means that this person is someone who is campaigning/informing people to bring about certain political or social changes.</span>
She hadn't washed her hands