In 2013, the Supreme Court made a ruling in the Davis v. the University of Texas at Austin case that the college must show compelling evidence that racial preferences are justified as one of the admissions criteria.
<h3>In Davis v. UT Austin, what decision did the Supreme Court make?</h3>
In Davis v. the University of Texas at Austin (Fisher), the U.S. Supreme Court (the "Court") decided on June 23, 2016, by a vote of 4-3 that the university's race-conscious admissions policy complied with the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.
In its 2013 decision in Davis v. Texas, which remanded the case to the Fifth Circuit, the Supreme Court set high requirements for affirmative action policies, saying that colleges could only take race into account when making admissions decisions if they could provide a "reasoned, principled explanation" for wanting a diverse student body.
To know more about University of Texas refer to: brainly.com/question/2437326
#SPJ4
Answer:
B and C
Explanation:
The Union's modern and financial limit took off during the conflict as the North proceeded with its fast industrialization to smother the insubordination. In the South, a more modest modern base, less rail lines, and a rural economy dependent on slave work made preparation of assets more troublesome.
Answer: Option (B) is correct
Explanation:
The IRB which is known as Institutional Review Board is the body that looks after the rights of subjects of human research in an affiliated institution. The IRB needs to analyze the research that takes into consideration human participation. Although it should be noted that officials of a research institution may have the power to overrule an approval by IRB. It reviews whether human life is at risk while participating. It looks after participants right and privacy.
