Answer:
Investment theory of creativity
Explanation:
Researchers Robert Sternberg and Todd Lubart have proposed a theory called the <u>investment theory of creativity</u>. According to the authors, creative people are like good investors: they buy low and sell high. Their research show that creative ideas are rejected as bizarre or ridiculous by most people when they first come out, and thus they are worth little. Creative people are willing to champion these ideas that are not generally accepted, and it is in this sense that they are "buying low". They try hard to convince other people of the value of the new idea, and eventually they turn them into supported and high value ideas. Creative people "sell high" when they move on from the now generally accepted idea on to the next unpopular but promising idea.
A real world example of this theory was famous filmmaker Stanley Kubrick. When most of his movies first came out, they usually were met with mixed or negative reviews, as was the case of films like <em>A Clockwork Orange </em>(1971) or <em>The Shining </em>(1980). However, after a few years, they were widely recognized as cinematic masterpieces.
Verna system divides the Indian Society into Brahman, Kshatriya, Vaishyas, and Shudras which was originated during Vedic System, however, the three societies Brahman Kshatriya and Vaishyas gain inheritance with other Indo-European Societies whereas Shudras was added by Brahmans from northern India and division of society according to Verna system was highly prevalent during colonialism which played key role in division of population
You could be found in contempt of court if you speak to a reporter about a matter that is now in court in a way that could be interpreted as seeking to sway a jury or potential jurors.
Actions that disobey a court's authority, disrespect a court, or prevent a court from carrying out its duties are all considered to be in contempt of court.
Criminal and civil contempt are the two types of contempt. Criminal contempt of court is frequently defined as conduct that one might typically connect with the term "contempt of court," such as producing a significant disturbance in the courtroom, screaming at the judge, or declining to testify before a grand jury.
When someone disobeys a court order, it most frequently results in civil contempt of court and harm to the rights of a third party. For instance, civil contempt sanctions may be imposed for failure to pay child support as directed by the court. Usually, the aggrieved party, such as a parent who has not received child support payments as per court order, may bring a civil contempt action.
To know more about civil contempt click here,
brainly.com/question/29689260
#SPJ4
I believe they would be named historians.<span />
Answer:
Because a lot of things have not yet been discovered and questioned as well as there being billions of things that we have absolutely no knowledge about.
