Two, Three, and Four.
Two because under capitalism, all industries are owned by private individuals.
Three because under capitalism, people are able to either work for someone else, or start their own business.
Four because under capitalism, supply and demand are the core principle of capitalism.
One and Five are both more of communism. Karl Marx came up with the communist manifesto, and wages being set by the government is a very authoritarian and leftist ideal.
Answer:
The law sets the maximum at 70 mph, but allows the Texas Transportation Commission to establish a maximum speed limit of 75 mph (80 mph or 85 mph if the highway is designed to accommodate that speed) on the highway system if that speed is determined to be safe and reasonable after a traffic or engineering study.
Explanation:
Answer:
to prevent other nations from building bombs
to avoid spies learning of the work
Explanation:
The purpose of the Manhattan Project was to develop the atomic bomb. It was a secret government project started in 1942 in response to the activities of Nazi Germany. America feared the Nazi Germany experiment and weapons in World War II. The project was kept secret as the United States did not want other nations especially, Germans to get their hands in nuclear weapons.The project became successful when the American military conducted a test in 1945 in New Mexico.
Answer:
Legally, representatives of the Electoral College have the right to vote as they like and for whom they want, ignoring the results of popular vote in their states. State governments, for their part, have the power to impose monetary fines and, in some states, to revoke such votes. The general situation was clarified by the Supreme Court in 1954 in the ruling in Ray v. Blair. It was clarified that the states and parties to which the electors belong have the right to demand from them a preliminary “pledge to vote” and provide for actions in case of violation of such an oath, but they cannot prosecute electors in the framework of criminal procedure of the Code for breaking such an oath.
Now, the Supreme Court places emphasis on the protection of the popular will, which gives voters the task of voting for the required candidates. If this were not the case and the voters chose with absolute freedom which candidate to vote for, the popular will would be severely impaired and the voters would be practically the only voters who would define the destiny of the federal government.
