Han applies option c- he is challenging the credibility of sources. Ramona ,surprised, asks him if the evidence from Pettit's book was from fictional sources. Hans supports his claim through a review of Giovanni Fiorini's book. The material from this book which had been written by a story-teller and not by a historian was used by Pettit.
Option a- is wrong. Hans is not determining new research goals. He is questioning the credibility of sources.
Option b-is wrong. Hans is evaluating what an author said about Giovanni Fiorini's book. The material from this 'great' source was used by Pettit in <em>his </em>book.
Option d is wrong. Ramona is asking clarifying questions. She wants Hans to justify his claim. This states that the credibility of sources can be questioned.
Its hard to say does the author seem mad happy or sad look over it again
Answer:
What’s the speech supposed to be about??
Explanation:
The correct answer for the question that is being presented above is this one: "first-person or third-person omniscient." If the story "Two Kinds" had been told through Suyuan's point of view, the type of narration that would be appropriate is that first-person or third-person omniscient.
Answer:A is the correct answer
Explanation:The reason for that is because if you ever don't understand a word you see the surrounding words or phrases.For example,the sentence "The little girl coward in fear when she saw the spider" Lets say you didn't know what coward meant but w do know that the sentence states that she feared the spider so coward might mean to be afraid or unable to do something.
